Search, detection, navigation, guidance, aeronautical, and nautical systems and instrument manufacturing · North Carolina

HNCGB01

Greensboro, NC · ~133 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HNCGB01 runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Search, detection, navigation, guidance, aeronautical, and nautical systems and instrument manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

HNCGB01: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Search, detection, navigation, guidance, aeronautical, and nautical systems and instrument manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HNCGB01 safety composite

HNCGB01 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2016→2024

HNCGB01 injury rate improved

HNCGB01's TCR fell 3.5 from 4.1 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO NGAS-OH12
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NGAS-OH12 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

HNCGB01 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HNCGB01 averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Search, detection, navigation, guidance, aeronautical, and nautical systems and instrument manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HNCGB01 TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where HNCGB01 falls in its industry

388 Search, detection, navigation, establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Search, detection, navigation, employers in North Carolina.

HNCGB01 (133 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate HNCGB01
HNCGB01 (133 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

HNCGB01 has fewer employees than the Search, detection, navigation, guidance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2023 2.3 1.7 3 1 0
2022 2.6 2.0 4 0 0
2021 2.6 2.0 3 1 0
2020 1.6 1.6 1 1 0
2019 2.6 1.8 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.8 0.0 2 0 0
2016 4.1 2.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · NC · Greensboro

388 Search, detection, navigation, guidance, aeronautical, and nautical systems and instrument manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NGAS-OH12 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Broomfield BRD 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cobham EW & Integrated Solutions (EIS) 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGMS-B126 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 7837-DUKE LEE 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyper Networks, LLC 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kemco of Burlington, Inc 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE IOI Enterprises, Inc. 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Coca-Cola Columbus Syrup Plant 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Flexospan 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 032 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rochester Precision Optics 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE HNJFP01 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaverton Honda 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE County of Kalamazoo - Admin. Building 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE FL-MTUSA-FLORIDA 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.