Employer · New Jersey

K79 Sen - Mount Olive

Mount Olive, NJ · ~67 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

K79 Sen - Mount Olive runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade B.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.3
industry benchmark (BLS)
3
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares K79 Sen - Mount Olive's OSHA Total Case Rate of 2.3 to the industry BLS benchmark of 3.3 (71% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

K79 Sen - Mount Olive's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.

-20246 20162017 03.3 Industry benchmarkK79 Sen - Mount Olive TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 334513.

Where K79 Sen - Mount Olive falls in its industry

431 industry establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 10 industry employers in New Jersey.

Trend analysis for K79 Sen - Mount Olive

Between 2016 and 2017, K79 Sen - Mount Olive's Total Case Rate improved from 4.7 to 0.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 100% decrease across 1 year of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2017, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2016 saw the highest rate, at 4.7, a spread of 4.7 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 2 reporting years, K79 Sen - Mount Olive recorded 3 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 3 injuries shown on this page for K79 Sen - Mount Olive are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 334513 - industry classification.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2017)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 118,600 hours worked = 0.00 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
K79 Sen - Mount Olive (this establishment) 2.34 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 334513
New Jersey state avg (all industries) 4.90 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by K79 Sen - Mount Olive to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.7 0.0 3 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on K79 Sen - Mount Olive's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its industry peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.

  • At 71% of the industry benchmark, K79 Sen - Mount Olive reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider industry sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is K79 Sen - Mount Olive's safety grade?
K79 Sen - Mount Olive has a safety grade of B (Good Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.3 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for their industry.
How many injuries has K79 Sen - Mount Olive reported?
K79 Sen - Mount Olive has reported 3 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2017, 2016). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within New Jersey, and by nearby establishments in Mount Olive - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.