Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Utah

Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT

Salt Lake City, UT · ~147 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT: 0.6 TCR = 27% of Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT safety composite

Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2020→2021

Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT injury rate improved

Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.1 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Salt Lake City, UT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/18
  • PHOTO Commercial HVAC Amer…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Mid-America Heartland : SVC-Oklahoma OK-USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT averages 0.6 TCR (27% of the Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT TCR series: 2020=1.1 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT falls in its industry

2,560 Construction machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 18 Construction machinery and equ employers in Utah.

Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT (147 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT
Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT (147 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Komatsu Salt Lake City, UT has more employees than the Construction machinery and equipment rep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · UT · Salt Lake City

2,560 Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Mid-America Heartland : SVC-Oklahoma OK-USA 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CED New Jersey 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holt AG Solutions Yuba City 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Savannah Port Wentworth Depot 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE NFPG1 - Corporate Office - PlGrove 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ambia Energy, LLC 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Construction Enterprises 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Storm Products Inc. 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Applied Materials 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HHI 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR DuPont Kinston 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta Fulton County - AFC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Woodland Vilage 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centuri Corporate 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Fraser - Blackshear 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington Marriott Georgetown 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.