Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities · Tennessee

Stones River Central Office

Murfreesboro, TN · ~61 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stones River Central Office runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Stones River Central Office: 1.7 TCR = 44% of Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stones River Central Office safety composite

Stones River Central Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2016→2024

Stones River Central Office injury rate improved

Stones River Central Office's TCR fell 4.1 from 4.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2017=7.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Murfreesboro, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.7 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/38
  • PHOTO Algier IRA
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Algier IRA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Stones River Central Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stones River Central Office averages 1.7 TCR (44% of the Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stones River Central Office TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=7.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Stones River Central Office falls in its industry

2,261 Residential Intellectual and D establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 38 Residential Intellectual and D employers in Tennessee.

Stones River Central Office (61 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Stones River Central Office
Stones River Central Office (61 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Stones River Central Office has fewer employees than the Residential Intellectual and Development median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 7.5 6.0 5 0 0
2016 4.1 4.1 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · TN · Murfreesboro

2,261 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 256 employers in Murfreesboro, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Algier IRA 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pineview IRA 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hazelwood Center 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-482897 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CORPORATE OFFICE 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Utility Construction, LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE JOB 230B 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blount County Highway Dept 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Murfreesboro 2,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR TNNAS16 ASCENSION SAINT THOMAS RUTHERFORD 1,984 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BNA3 1,811 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BNA3 1,708 FTE
NAT-TCR Spring Hills, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Insituform Technologies LLC - Chesterfield 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Residence Inn 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Moog, Inc - Blacksburg Central 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Doyle Production Plant 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forino Co., LP 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE B-W Grinding Service, Inc. 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.