Electric power generation, nuclear · Pennsylvania

Limerick Generating Station

Pottstown, PA · ~775 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Limerick Generating Station runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, nuclear workplace, earning a grade A.

Limerick Generating Station: 0.1 TCR = 12% of Electric power generation, nuclear BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Limerick Generating Station safety composite

Limerick Generating Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Limerick Generating Station held a steady TCR band

Limerick Generating Station's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.1 in 2016 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.1 · 2017=0.2 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Pottstown, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Clinton Power Station
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~775 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clinton Power Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Limerick Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Limerick Generating Station averages 0.1 TCR (12% of the Electric power generation, nuclear BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Limerick Generating Station TCR series: 2016=0.1 · 2017=0.2 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Limerick Generating Station falls in its industry

80 Electric power generation, nuc establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Electric power generation, nuc employers in Pennsylvania.

Limerick Generating Station (775 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Limerick Generating Station
Limerick Generating Station (775 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Limerick Generating Station has more employees than the Electric power generation, nuclear median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.1 0 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.4 0.0 1 3 0
2018 0.3 0.1 2 1 0
2017 0.2 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.1 0.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · PA · Pottstown

80 Electric power generation, nuclear employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 110 employers in Pottstown, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clinton Power Station 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robinson Nuclear Plant 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE American Craft Brewery (Samual Adams PA Brewery) 775 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL - EPISCOPAL CAMPUS 775 FTE
STATE-SIZE Volvo Construction Equipment 774 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Coast Disribution Center ECDC 774 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pottstown Hospital LLC 888 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pottstown Plant 328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buckman's Inc. 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR Venezia Bulk Services Inc. 306 FTE
NAT-TCR Clinton Power Station 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilbane Building Company Jacksonville 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Selmer Lubes 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dawn Food Products - Home Office 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cutco Corporation 775 FTE
NAT-SIZE One Federal Street 775 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mount Sinai Union Square 775 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - AGS5 775 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.