Nuclear Electric Power Generation · South Carolina

Robinson Nuclear Plant

Hartsville, SC · ~604 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Robinson Nuclear Plant runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nuclear Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade A.

Robinson Nuclear Plant: 0.1 TCR = 12% of Nuclear Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Robinson Nuclear Plant safety composite

Robinson Nuclear Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Robinson Nuclear Plant held a steady TCR band

Robinson Nuclear Plant's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Hartsville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK P68
  • PHOTO Clinton Power Station
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~604 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clinton Power Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Robinson Nuclear Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Robinson Nuclear Plant averages 0.1 TCR (12% of the Nuclear Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Robinson Nuclear Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Robinson Nuclear Plant falls in its industry

80 Nuclear Electric Power Generat establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Robinson Nuclear Plant (604 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Robinson Nuclear Plant
Robinson Nuclear Plant (604 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Robinson Nuclear Plant has fewer employees than the Nuclear Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2023 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2022 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2019 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · SC · Hartsville

80 Nuclear Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 41 employers in Hartsville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clinton Power Station 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Limerick Generating Station 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE IVC - Nutra Greenville 604 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prisma Health Baptist Parkridge 604 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate/ATC 603 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greer Terminal 605 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hartsville - Hrtsvlle 1,544 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carolina Pines Regional Medical Center 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR S0318 CAROLINA PINES REG MED CTR 554 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1135 313 FTE
NAT-TCR BrandSafway Solutions LLC - Chevron Refinery - Pascagoula 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Arkel Constructors 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cianbro Pittsfield 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Seco Tools, LLC 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schlumberger LLC 604 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frankfort Core Plant 604 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cameron Memorial Community Hospital 604 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edwards Oil Company Inc. 604 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.