Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Minnesota

Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha

Wabasha, MN · ~29 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade A.

Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha: 2.7 TCR = 36% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha safety composite

Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2017→2018

Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha injury rate improved

Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha's TCR fell 5.3 from 5.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.3 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Wabasha, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.7 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #44/249
  • PHOTO Spaulding Hospital F…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spaulding Hospital For Continuing Medical Care North Shore (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha averages 2.7 TCR (36% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2018=0 · BLS 7.5

Where Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 249 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Minnesota.

Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha (29 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha
Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha (29 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Mayo Clinic Health System-Wabasha has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.3 2.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MN · Wabasha

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 13 employers in Wabasha, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spaulding Hospital For Continuing Medical Care North Shore 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Mary's General Hospital 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Memorial Medical Center 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holy Rosary Hospital 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy LLP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE The tru Shrimp Company 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2530-Redwood Falls, MN-FND (Monsanto Co.) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasota Stone Fabricators 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-WIAPP030 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Overland Ltd. 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardinal Health Wabasha 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR KPR U.S., LLC- Wabasha 88 FTE
NAT-TCR TRW Automotive-Rogersville 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ricky's 17th Street 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Place - Litchfield 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Creve Coeur 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Parrish Medical Ctr Food 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE KWF Lakeland, FL 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.