Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Maryland

Montgomery Bus Division

Rockville, MD · ~519 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Montgomery Bus Division runs at 282% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade F.

Montgomery Bus Division: 12.7 TCR = 282% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Montgomery Bus Division safety composite

Montgomery Bus Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Montgomery Bus Division: 14.6 → 15.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 15.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2022

Montgomery Bus Division's TCR rose 1.3 from 14.6 in 2018 to 15.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Rockville, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.7 · 282% of ind

  • DART 14.6 DART
  • RANK #16/20
  • PHOTO 1953-2168
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 247 inj
  • SIZE ~519 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1953-2168 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Montgomery Bus Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Montgomery Bus Division averages 12.7 TCR (282% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Montgomery Bus Division TCR series: 2018=14.6 · 2019=9.1 · 2020=9.1 · 2021=14.7 · 2022=15.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Montgomery Bus Division falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 20 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in Maryland.

Montgomery Bus Division (519 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Montgomery Bus Division
Montgomery Bus Division (519 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Montgomery Bus Division has more employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 15.9 14.6 64 22 0
2021 14.7 14.1 56 20 0
2020 9.1 8.6 34 7 0
2019 9.1 8.9 37 8 0
2018 14.6 13.6 56 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · MD · Rockville

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 225 employers in Rockville, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1953-2168 12.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Omnitrans West 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division 3 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division 13 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MTN7 519 FTE
STATE-SIZE Resource Management Concepts, Inc. 519 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Sugar Refining, Inc. 518 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2357 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist Health Shady Grove Medical Center 2,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Medical Center 2,461 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shady Grove Adventist Hospital 2,357 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOM's Organic Market 1,354 FTE
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-01594 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 276617-Purvis Po 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Gulf Coast Teaching Family Services 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Villas at St James 12.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Venturi Restoration 519 FTE
NAT-SIZE Masterbrand Cabinets 519 FTE
NAT-SIZE FG Idaho Plant - Caldwell 519 FTE
NAT-SIZE Basin Electric Power Cooperative - Headquarters Office 519 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.