Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction · Texas

Montgomery County CCGT Power Station Project

Name: Montgomery County CCGT Power Station Project Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Willis, TX · ~249 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 0.0
Avg TCR: 2.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Montgomery County CCGT Power Station Project runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Montgomery County CCGT Power Station Project: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Montgomery County CCGT Power Station Project safety composite

Montgomery County CCGT Power Station Project scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Montgomery County CCGT Power Station Project held a steady TCR band

Montgomery County CCGT Power Station Project's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Willis, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #0/161
PHOTO 15-100 IN
BOOK 2y book
INJ 0 inj
SIZE ~249 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 15-100 IN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

105185 - IPP R

0.1
103171 - Hunti

0.1
This site

0
15-100 IN

0
Hanwha Q Cells

0

What this shows Montgomery County CCGT Power Station Project averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction BLS benchmark).

Montgomery County CCGT Power Station Project TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Montgomery County CCGT Power Station Project falls in its industry

1,605 Power plant (except hydroelect establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 161 Power plant (except hydroelect employers in Texas.

Montgomery County CCGT Power Station Project (249 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Montgomery County CCGT Power Station Project has more employees than the Power plant (except hydroelectric) const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2019	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2018	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · TX · Willis

1,605 Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 30 employers in Willis, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	15-100 IN	REYNOLDS, IN	0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Hanwha Q Cells USA Corp.	IRVINE, CA	0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	105185 - IPP Repowering- 840MW 2x2x1 CC	DELTA, UT	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project	HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA	0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Petrobras America, Inc.	HOUSTON	249 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CrownQuest Operating, LLC	MIDLAND	249 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Silvertip Completions Services, LLC	MIDLAND	249 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Fighting Jays Solar 20145001	GUY	249 FTE
CITY-NEAR	QES Directional Drilling	Willis	389 FTE
CITY-NEAR	034-00014	Willis	261 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Weisinger, Inc. - Willis	Willis	195 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Weisinger Incorporated	Willis	171 FTE
NAT-TCR	Meijer	Sturgis, MI	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Columbus Health and Rehab	Columbus, WI	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Portsmouth NNSY Commissary	Portsmouth, VA	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	CA-Solmetric	Sebastopol, CA	0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division	Shelbyville, TN	249 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Pierceton - Instruments & Implants	Pierceton, IN	249 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Chemring Ordnance, Inc.	Perry, FL	249 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Martin Engineering - Neponset	Neponset, IL	249 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.