DCM · Michigan

Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI

Highland Park, MI · ~56 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical DCM workplace, earning a grade A.

Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI: 2.0 TCR = 35% of DCM BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI safety composite

Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI held a steady TCR band

Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.6 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Highland Park, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #54/194
  • PHOTO National Distributio…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: National Distribution Centers LLC-27143 Elwood International Port Rd (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI averages 2.0 TCR (35% of the DCM BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=1.5 · BLS 5.8

Where Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI falls in its industry

9,477 DCM establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 194 DCM employers in Michigan.

Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI (56 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI
Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI (56 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Penske : 5130-00 Shinola Detroit LLC/Highland Park, MI has fewer employees than the DCM median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2016 1.6 1.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MI · Highland Park

9,477 DCM employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 26 employers in Highland Park, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-27143 Elwood International Port Rd 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR WA - PepsiCo 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 40500 CAPSTONE - FD FRONT ROYAL VA 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR New England Appliance Group, Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE John B Schaendorf Dairy 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamtramck Energy Services 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE A. Lindberg & Sons Inc. 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cipparrone Contracting Inc 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Wine and Spirits 1,368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Seating Detroit 903 FTE
CITY-NEAR John E. Green Company 760 FTE
NAT-TCR Trumbull Corporation and Brayman Construction Corporation, A Joint Venture 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Office 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR imi Louisville KY Plant 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bemis Healthcare Packaging - Carolina 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Office, Maintenance , Camp, Non Medical Transportation 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ricky's South Beach 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cincinnati-West Chester Branch 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-PD-CAE-COLUMBIA-PD 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.