Waste management program administration · Utah

Rec. Plant 1365 W. 2300 No.

Name: Rec. Plant 1365 W. 2300 No. Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Salt Lake City, UT · ~68 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 12.1
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rec. Plant 1365 W. 2300 No. runs at 378% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste management program administration workplace, earning a grade F.

Rec. Plant 1365 W. 2300 No.: 12.1 TCR = 378% of Waste management program administration BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rec. Plant 1365 W. 2300 No. safety composite

Rec. Plant 1365 W. 2300 No. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 12.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2019→2023

Rec. Plant 1365 W. 2300 No. injury rate improved

Rec. Plant 1365 W. 2300 No.'s TCR fell 7.5 from 13.6 in 2019 to 6.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=13.6 · 2020=15.4 · 2021=13.4 · 2023=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924110 · Salt Lake City, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.1 · 378% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #4/4
PHOTO Public Works
BOOK 4y book
INJ 25 inj
SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Public Works (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Public Works

12.3
Utilities and

12.3
This site

12.1
Public Works

11.8
Albuquerque Me

11.8

What this shows Rec. Plant 1365 W. 2300 No. averages 12.1 TCR (378% of the Waste management program administration BLS benchmark).

Rec. Plant 1365 W. 2300 No. TCR series: 2019=13.6 · 2020=15.4 · 2021=13.4 · 2023=6.1 · BLS 3.2

Where Rec. Plant 1365 W. 2300 No. falls in its industry

131 Waste management program admin establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Waste management program admin employers in Utah.

Rec. Plant 1365 W. 2300 No. (68 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Rec. Plant 1365 W. 2300 No. has fewer employees than the Waste management program administration median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2023	6.1	0.0	3
2021	13.4	5.7	7
2020	15.4	1.9	8
2019	13.6	9.7	7

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924110 · UT · Salt Lake City

131 Waste management program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Public Works	LAKE OSWEGO, OR	12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Utilities and Environemtal Services	HAYWARD, CA	12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Public Works	MODESTO, CA	11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority	ALBUQUERQUE, NM	11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Chums	SALT LAKE CITY	68 FTE
STATE-SIZE	The Synergy Company of Utah	MOAB	68 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Heritage Bag - Ogden	OGDEN	68 FTE
STATE-SIZE	INTERSTATE GRATINGS LLC	LINDON	68 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Delta Air Lines - SLC	Salt Lake City	4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR	PC - Primary Childrens Hospital	Salt Lake City	3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR	L3 Technologies, Inc.	Salt Lake City	3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Salt Lake City Terminal	Salt Lake City	2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR	Nri USA, LLC - Li	Chino, CA	12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Stop & Shop 102555	Merrick, NY	12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	GPSPCA Merriam	Merriam, KS	12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Atlanta Marble Manufacturing	Decatur, GA	12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Ted Conner Landscaping, Inc.	Pompano Beach, FL	68 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Concord Coach Lines, Inc. - Portland Transportation Center	Portland, ME	68 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Fiesta # 31	Houston, TX	68 FTE
NAT-SIZE	State Street Assisted Living	Dover, DE	68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.