General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · North Carolina

Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport

Charlotte, NC · ~54 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade B.

Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport: 3.1 TCR = 68% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport safety composite

Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport: 1.4 → 6.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.68× in 2024

Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport's TCR rose 5.0 from 1.4 in 2022 to 6.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.1 · 68% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #60/125
  • PHOTO Greif Mid Atlantic D…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greif Mid Atlantic Ded Riverville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport averages 3.1 TCR (68% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport TCR series: 2022=1.4 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 125 General freight trucking, long employers in North Carolina.

Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport (54 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport
Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport (54 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Charlotte- Dry Bulk Transport has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 5.2 4 1 0
2023 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · NC · Charlotte

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greif Mid Atlantic Ded Riverville 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlanta 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha Terminal 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inver Grove Heights Terminal (MINNMN) 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE ER LEWIS CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elizabethtown 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Raleigh North 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31045 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Redner's Warehouse Market Sinking Spring 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Renaissance DelMonte Lodge 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Stevens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Hallettsville 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kingsville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3035, 1309 Keystone 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1321 Lkq 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 09 Eveleth 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3013 Keystone 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.