Industry profile · NAICS 336413

Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 691 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

691
Employers
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
9,418
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing average 2.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
691
employers reporting
9,418
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing sector (NAICS 336413) encompasses 691 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 9,418 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.5 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 13 of 15
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Hamilton Sundstrand RKFD Plt 6, (Collins Aerospace) Rockford, IL A 0.3
B/E Aerospace Inc (Medley FL) Medley, FL A 0.3
CymSTAR Services LLC Broken Arrow, OK A 0.3
Jormac Aerospace - Largo, Florida Largo, FL A 0.3
UTAS Rockford Plant 6 Rockford, IL A 0.3
BE Aerospace, Inc (Anaheim CA) Anaheim, CA A 0.3
NGTS-R955 Oklahoma City, OK A 0.3
Goodrich Aerostructures Foley, AL A 0.3
NGDS-A583 Patuxent River, MD A 0.3
AMI Industries Inc (Colorado Springs CO) Colorado Springs, CO A 0.3
Martinic Engineering AZ Tolleson, AZ A 0.3
Rohr Aero Services LLC (Foley AL) Foley, AL A 0.3
Special Mission Aircraft Fort Worth, TX A 0.3
Capewell Aerial Systems LLC Meadows of Dan, VA A 0.3
United Technologies Corporation dba as Goodrich Corporation Brea, CA A 0.3
Grand Rapids Aero Mi Kentwood, MI A 0.3
Goodrich - Aerostructures (OEM & MRO) Foley, AL A 0.3
Foley (240) Foley, AL A 0.3
Msd Orchard Park Orchard Park, NY A 0.3
BE Aerospace, Inc (Lenexa KS) Lenexa, KS A 0.3
Rohr Inc a UTC Aerospace Systems Company Chula Vista, CA A 0.3
Acss L3 Communications Tcas LLC Phoenix, AZ A 0.3
Enviro Systems Seminole, OK A 0.3
LORD Corporation - Dayton Dayton, OH A 0.2
Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace Urbana, OH A 0.2
B/E Aerospace, Inc. (New Berlin WI) New Berlin, WI A 0.2
Systems : UD EPISCenter Dayton, OH A 0.2
Aerospace : Elyria FSD Elyria, OH A 0.2
Hamilton Sundstrand Windsor Locks, CT A 0.2
Ontic Engineering and Manufacturing Orlando, FL A 0.2
AUSCO Inc. Farmingdale, NY A 0.2
Hamilton Sundstrand Aviation Services Inc Miramar, FL A 0.2
Aerospace : Hauppauge Hauppauge, NY A 0.2
Thales Avionics INC CA Irvine, CA A 0.2
Astronics AES Kirkland, WA A 0.2
Safran Cabin Huntington Beach, CA A 0.2
Irvine Hq Ca Irvine, CA A 0.2
B/E Aerospace Inc (Lenexa KS) Lenexa, KS A 0.2
Ducommun - Huntsville Huntsville, AR A 0.1
Rohr, Inc. (Chula Vista CA) Chula Vista, CA A 0.1
Celestica Tucson Tucson, AZ A 0.1
HoneywellAZ18 Tempe, AZ A 0.1
Goodrich Corporation (Brea CA) Brea, CA A 0.1
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (Windsor Locks CT) Windsor Locks, CT A 0.1
Rockwell Collins Simulation & Training Solutions LLC (Sterling VA) Sterling, VA A 0.1
Goodrich Corporation (Monroe NC) Monroe, NC A 0.1
Hamilton Sundstrand de Puerto Rico, Inc Puerto Rico, PR A 0.1
BE Aerospace Inc (WinstonSalem NC Fairchild Winstonsalem, NC A 0.1
NGDS-R955 Oklahoma City, OK A 0.1
Goodrich Corporation (Jamestown ND) Jamestown, ND A 0.1
← Prev Page 13 of 15 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.5 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.