Industry profile · NAICS 561621

Alarm system monitoring services

Workplace injury rates across 206 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

206
Employers
2.5
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
997
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Alarm system monitoring services average 2.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

2.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
206
employers reporting
997
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Alarm system monitoring services Safety Data Reveals

The Alarm system monitoring services sector (NAICS 561621) encompasses 206 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 997 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.5 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Alarm system monitoring services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 5
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Orlando FS (SSS, CSS) Orlando, FL B 1.3
Houston - 202 Houston, TX A 1.3
Active Security Consulting LLC Middleburg, VA A 1.3
Oklahoma City - 216 Oklahoma City, OK A 1.3
Austin - 204 Austin, TX A 1.3
RAL-CPIS-RALEIGH,NC Morrisville, NC A 1.3
Townsend Systems, LLC Jackson, TN A 1.2
WIN-CPIS-GREENSBORO,NC Greensboro, NC A 1.2
Rochester FS (SSS, CSS) Rochester, NY A 1.2
Tampa - 409 Tampa, FL A 1.2
Tech Systems, Inc Buford, GA A 1.2
Milwaukie FS (SSS, CSS) Milwaukie, OR A 1.2
Lorton FS (SSS, CSS) Lorton, VA A 1.1
Plymouth FS (SSS, CSS) Plymouth, MN A 1.1
Brighton, MI (SSS, CSS) Brighton, MI A 1.1
Charlotte, NC (SSS, CSS) Charlotte, NC A 1.1
Tucker FS (SSS, CSS) Tucker, GA A 1.1
INA Alert INC Ellinwood, KS A 1.0
Advant Solutions LLC Honesdale, PA A 1.0
Santa Ana FS (SSS,CSS) Santa Ana, CA A 1.0
Lincoln FS (SSS,SHS) Lincoln, NE A 1.0
CPI Security Charlotte Division Charlotte, NC A 0.9
Centennial, CO (SSS, CSS) Centennial, CO A 0.9
Hard Fire Suppression Systems, Inc. Worthington, OH A 0.9
Westerville FS (SSS, CSS) Westerville, OH A 0.9
Ohio - 105 Macadonia, OH A 0.9
Northern California - 602 Pleasanton, CA A 0.9
West Chester FS (SSS, CSS) West Chester, OH A 0.8
Tampa FS (SSS, CSS) Tampa, FL A 0.8
San Antonio - 206 San Antonio, TX A 0.8
Greenfield FS (SSS,CSS) Greenfield, IN A 0.8
Southern California - 601 Orange, CA A 0.8
Houston FS (SSS, CSS) Houston, TX A 0.8
Portland - 302 Tualatin, OR A 0.7
Wilson Fire Equipment & Service Company Houston, TX A 0.7
Midwest Alarm Company Sioux Falls, SD A 0.7
Las Vegas FS (SSS, SLS, CSS) Las Vegas, NV A 0.7
Stone Mountain FS (SSS, CSS) Stone Mountain, GA A 0.7
Denver - 350 Centennial, CO A 0.7
Richmond - 444 Richmond, VA A 0.7
Lacey FS (SSS,CSS) Lacey, WA A 0.7
Integrated Protection Services Cincinnati, OH A 0.7
Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS) Indianapolis, IN A 0.6
Txh-90-Houston, Tx Houston, TX A 0.6
East Long Meadow FS (GTS, HTSG) Longmeadow, MA A 0.6
Cha-Cpis-South Charlotte,Nc Charlotte, NC A 0.6
Miramar FS (SSS,CSS) Miramar, FL A 0.5
Securitec One, Inc. Medina, OH A 0.5
CA180 Fresno, CA A 0.5
Lee's Summit FS (SSS, CSS) Lee'S Summit, MO A 0.5
← Prev Page 3 of 5 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Alarm system monitoring services?

This sector averages 2.5 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.