Industry profile · NAICS 541711

Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in chemical sciences

Workplace injury rates across 274 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

274
Employers
1.9
Avg TCR
0.5
BLS benchmark
2,931
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in chemical sciences average 1.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 3.7 times the BLS national benchmark of 0.5.

1.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
0.5
BLS national benchmark
274
employers reporting
2,931
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in chemical sciences Safety Data Reveals

The Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in chemical sciences sector (NAICS 541711) encompasses 274 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,931 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 0.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in chemical sciences that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 5 of 6
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Altis Biosystems, Inc. Durham, NC C 0.0
Precision for Medicine Houston Texas Houston, TX C 0.0
Precision for Medicine Norton Massachusetts Norton, MA C 0.0
MiNK Lexington, MA C 0.0
PacBio Lusk San Diego, CA C 0.0
1uCity 11th and 12th Floor Philadelphia, PA C 0.0
Azzur Consulting, LLC Hatboro, PA C 0.0
Cobalt, LLC Hatboro, PA C 0.0
CRISPR Therapeutics Boston, MA C 0.0
Neurotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc Cumberland, RI C 0.0
Nvision Biomedical Technologies, Inc. San Antonio, TX C 0.0
Ginkgo Bioworks Inc. 890 Embarcadero Drive, West Sacramento, CA West Sacramento, CA C 0.0
Dragonfly Therapeutics Waltham, MA C 0.0
Skyhawk Therapeutics Waltham, MA C 0.0
Kindeva Drug Delivery Woodbury, MN C 0.0
ImmunoReagents, Inc. Raleigh, NC C 0.0
Imanis Life Sciences Rochester, MN C 0.0
American Laboratory Products Co. Ltd. Salem, NH C 0.0
UCB Biosciences Bedford Bedford, MA C 0.0
Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Cambridge, MA C 0.0
Element Genomics Durham, NC C 0.0
Alexion 300 George New Haven, CT C 0.0
Immune-Onc Palo Alto, CA C 0.0
GPS-GA Atlanta, GA C 0.0
Aragen Bioscience Morgan Hill, CA C 0.0
NanoImaging Services, Inc. San Diego, CA C 0.0
Dentsply Sirona Charlotte Innovation Center Charlotte, NC C 0.0
GSK 300 Tech Square Cambridge, MA C 0.0
Ipsen - One Main Street, Cambridge MA Cambridge, MA C 0.0
4767 Nexus Center Drive San Diego, CA C 0.0
Corteva Agriscience Moorhead Research MHD1 Moorhead, MN C 0.0
Flatiron Health, Inc. Brooklyn, NY C 0.0
Seattle Research Seattle, WA C 0.0
Research Philadelphia, PA C 0.0
TDM and Translational Philadelphia, PA C 0.0
SRC Rome Rome, NY C 0.0
Bicycle Therapeutics Lexington, MA C 0.0
Davis R&D Facility Davis, CA C 0.0
Brooks R & D Site Brooks, OR C 0.0
XALT Energy Auburn Hills Auburn Hills, MI C 0.0
AFB International PARC Montgomery City, MO C 0.0
North American Science Associates - SLP Minneapolis, MN C 0.0
Albany Molecular Research, Inc. - East Rensselaer, NY C 0.0
BASF Agricultural Solutions PR, LLC Sabana Grande, PR C 0.0
ATI Powder Metals - Robinson Pittsburgh, PA C 0.0
GEOS Specialties - Fort Collins Fort Collins, CO C 0.0
GSK R&D Branford, CT Branford, CT C 0.0
GSK R&D site- Cambridge, MA Cambridge, MA C 0.0
Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN Olivia, MN C 0.0
SomaLogic - 2945 Wilderness Place Boulder, CO C 0.0
← Prev Page 5 of 6 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in chemical sciences?

This sector averages 1.9 against a BLS benchmark of 0.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.