Industry profile · NAICS 485113

Bus transit systems (except mixed mode)

Workplace injury rates across 356 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

356
Employers
6.2
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
13,002
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) average 6.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

6.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
356
employers reporting
13,002
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) Safety Data Reveals

The Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) sector (NAICS 485113) encompasses 356 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 13,002 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 6.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 6.2 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 5 of 8
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Keolis Transit America Hesperia Hesperia, CA C 4.4
0000000700 Transit-Mass Johnson City, TN C 4.3
Muncie Indiana Transit System Muncie, IN C 4.3
First Transit University at B4ffalo Getzville, NY C 4.3
Rogue Valley Trans. District Medford, OR C 4.3
Keolis Div 301, Reno Nevada Reno, NV C 4.3
City of Waukesha Metro Transit Waukesha, WI C 4.3
55436 Rochester Rochester, MN C 4.2
2662-7047 Springfield, VA C 4.2
2662-7030 Newark, OH C 4.2
2662-7002 Greensburg, PA C 4.2
Green Mountain Transit Burlington, VT C 4.2
6091-516 Garden City, NY C 4.2
6091-123 Lorton, VA C 4.1
6091-146 Fairfax, VA C 4.1
Johnson County 55838 Olathe, KS C 4.0
8354_19001 Flint, MI C 4.0
City of Ames - CyRide Ames, IL C 4.0
6091-593 San Francisco, CA C 4.0
55424 Houston Fixed Route Houston, TX C 4.0
TMR - Toms Toms River, NJ C 4.0
Waukesha Metro Transit Professional Transit Management of Waukesha Waukesha, WI C 4.0
Harmon Brothers Charter Services Inc. Union City, GA C 3.9
Rockland Coaches, Inc. Westwood, NJ C 3.9
6091-361 Santa Rosa, CA C 3.9
9273-KKS Milwaukee, WI C 3.9
3400 Four Mile Run Bus Facility Arlington, VA C 3.9
Cooperative Alliance for Seacoast Transportation Dover, NH C 3.9
Agency for Community Transit Granite City, IL C 3.9
6091-SS005 Dfw Airport, TX C 3.9
2662-7057 Hermitage, TN C 3.9
CyRide Ames, IA C 3.9
9022 Shuttle-Ssf South San Francisco, CA C 3.8
2662-9007 Austin, TX C 3.8
Springfield Mass Transit District Springfield, IL C 3.7
6091-362 Napa, CA C 3.6
Bloomington Public Transportation Corporation Bloomington, IN C 3.6
Orange Newark Elizabeth Bus Inc Elizabeth, NJ B 3.5
6091-SS002 Torrance, CA B 3.5
West Central Mass Transit District Jacksonville, IL B 3.5
2662-7033 Brooklyn, NY B 3.5
9020 Shuttle-San Jose San Jose, CA B 3.5
Curry Public Transit Inc Brookings, OR B 3.5
Charlottesville - Transit Charlottesville, VA B 3.4
55854 Spring Street Minneapolis, MN B 3.4
2662-7051 Stockton, CA B 3.4
Sioux Area Metro Sioux Falls, SD B 3.4
55431 Fort Bend County Sugar Land, TX B 3.4
LEO Leonardo Leonardo, NJ B 3.3
Greyhound New York New York, NY B 3.3
← Prev Page 5 of 8 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Bus transit systems (except mixed mode)?

This sector averages 6.2 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.