Industry profile · NAICS 485113

Bus transit systems (except mixed mode)

Workplace injury rates across 356 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

356
Employers
6.2
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
13,002
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) average 6.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

6.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
356
employers reporting
13,002
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) Safety Data Reveals

The Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) sector (NAICS 485113) encompasses 356 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 13,002 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 6.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 6.2 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 6 of 8
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Lane Transit District Eugene, OR B 3.3
6091-430 Sherman, TX B 3.3
Haight Inc Bronx, NY B 3.3
Keolis Transit Loudoun Leesburg, VA B 3.2
9011 Shuttle-Fremont Fremont, CA B 3.2
2662-7049 Bismarck, ND B 3.2
Transit (FST) Cedar Rapids, IA B 3.2
Keolis Keolis Transportation 14700 Potomac Mills Rd. Woodbridge, Manassas, VA B 3.2
Richmond Greyhound Bus Terminal Richmond, VA B 3.1
Transportation Roanoke, VA B 3.1
Person County Transportation Roxboro, NC B 3.1
3515-35150017 Leonardo, NJ B 3.0
516 Nassau County Garden City, NY B 3.0
City Of Clarksville Transit Clarksville, TN B 3.0
Transit Fredericksburg, VA B 3.0
OCCK-Transportation Center Salina, KS B 3.0
2662-7040 Lorton, VA B 2.9
Suburban Transit New Brunswick, NJ B 2.9
Trailblazer Joint Powers Board Glencoe, MN B 2.9
First Transit 55595 Tempe, AZ B 2.9
Classic Medical Transit Corp South El Monte, CA B 2.9
Transit Management of St Joseph St Joseph, MO B 2.8
362 Napa Napa, CA B 2.8
55457 Merced Merced, CA B 2.7
Housatonic Area Regional Transit Danbury, CT B 2.7
6091-455 Forest Park, GA B 2.7
University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN B 2.7
2662-7056 Barstow, CA B 2.7
6091-665 San Jose, CA B 2.6
City of Harrisonburg Transportation Department (Admin) Harrisonburg, VA B 2.6
6091-169 Colorado Springs, CO B 2.6
2662-4112 Brooklyn, NY B 2.5
Central Cab Company Waynesburg, PA B 2.5
2662-7037 White Plains, NY B 2.5
ACL of Atlanta Nocross, GA B 2.5
2662-9018 Burlingame, CA B 2.5
Coorperative Alliance for Seacoast Transportation Dover, NH B 2.4
Advance Transit, Inc. Wilder, VT B 2.4
6091-164 Hilburn, NY B 2.4
2662-9013 Menlo Park, CA B 2.3
2662-7063 Tucson, AZ A 2.2
6091-SS014 Denver, CO A 2.2
All Aboard America - Santa Fe Santa Fe, NM A 2.2
Allegany County Transit Cuba, NY A 2.0
Capital City Transit Juneau, AK A 2.0
Orange County - Department of Transportation Hillsborough, NC A 2.0
Winter Park Lift Bus Winter Park, CO A 2.0
First Transit 55431 Fort Bend County Rosenberg, TX A 1.9
7061 Transit Region-Phoenix Az Phoenix, AZ A 1.9
9016 Shuttle-Princeton Princeton, NJ A 1.9
← Prev Page 6 of 8 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Bus transit systems (except mixed mode)?

This sector averages 6.2 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.