Industry profile · NAICS 336111

Chassis, automobile, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 168 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

168
Employers
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
43,336
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Chassis, automobile, manufacturing average 5.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.5 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

5.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
168
employers reporting
43,336
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Chassis, automobile, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Chassis, automobile, manufacturing sector (NAICS 336111) encompasses 168 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 43,336 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.1 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Chassis, automobile, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Lucid Motors Tempe Tempe, AZ C 3.0
F & P America Manufacturing, Inc Troy, OH C 2.9
SA Automotive - Webberville Webberville, MI C 2.8
Jefferson North Assembly Plant Detroit, MI C 2.8
Driverge 1090 W. Wilbeth Akron, OH C 2.7
US Upfitters - Illinois Lombard, IL C 2.7
Gestamp Alabama Mccalla, AL B 2.4
Manufacturing Cusseta, AL B 2.4
Karma Automotive LLC - Moreno Valley Assembly Plant Moreno Valley, CA B 2.3
Dakkota Integrated Systems Sterling Heights Sterling Heights, MI B 2.3
CTC Pilot Plant Auburn Hills, MI B 2.3
Driverge Vehicle Innovations- Chapel Hill Akron, OH B 2.2
redi-Group Greenville, SC B 2.2
Toyota Boshoku Princeton, IN B 2.2
Avancez, LLC Arlington, TX B 2.1
Faurecia Exhaust Systems Louisville, KY B 2.1
BMW of Manhattan New York, NY B 2.1
Electric Vehicle Assembly Plant (EVAP) Mishawaka, IN B 2.1
KIA Georgia, Inc. West Point, GA B 2.0
Volvo Car US Operations/Ridgeville, SC Ridgeville, SC B 1.9
Advanced Technology Development Center Detroit, MI B 1.9
VWGoA Jacksonville PDC Jacksonville, FL B 1.8
Tower Automotive Plymouth, MI B 1.7
Foxconn EV System Lordstown, OH B 1.7
KIA Motors Manufacturing Georgia, Inc. West Point, GA B 1.7
Mobis US. Alabama Mccalla, AL A 1.6
Performance Management Center Marysville, OH A 1.6
BraunAbility Winamace, IN A 1.4
Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. Lafayette, IN A 1.4
Detroit Assembly Complex Mack Detroit, MI A 1.4
Hitachi Astemo Rock Spring Rockspring, GA A 1.4
Custom Service Manufacturing LLC Elkhorn, WI A 1.4
Android Industries - Lansing Delta Twp. Lansing, MI A 1.3
Indi EV Inc. Vernon, CA A 1.3
GM Global Technical Center Warren, MI A 1.3
Rivian Automotive, Inc. - Plymouth Plymouth, MI A 1.1
Thyssenkrupp Automotive Systems Chattanooga, TN A 1.1
Head Quarters (HQ) Santa Clara, CA A 1.1
Capacity of Texas Longview, TX A 1.0
Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc. Harrodsburg, KY A 1.0
Stoneridge Control Devices, Inc. Lexington, OH A 0.9
Yates Services, LLC @Nissan Canton Canton, MS A 0.7
Yates Services, LLC @ Nissan NSRC Warehouse Murfreesboro, TN A 0.7
Canoo Corporate Headquarters Torrance, CA A 0.6
Local Motors Chandler Chandler, AZ A 0.6
Lordstown Motors Corporation Lordstown, OH A 0.6
Toyota Boshoku Kentucky Harrodsburg Harrodsburg, KY A 0.5
JR Motorsports, LLC Mooresville, NC A 0.5
DEJ Holdings, LLC Mooresville, NC A 0.5
NY - VIC, VEC & Code Hauppauge, NY A 0.4
← Prev Page 3 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Chassis, automobile, manufacturing?

This sector averages 5.1 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.