Industry profile · NAICS 311615

Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food)

Workplace injury rates across 498 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

498
Employers
4.6
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
38,248
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) average 4.6 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

4.6
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
498
employers reporting
38,248
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) Safety Data Reveals

The Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) sector (NAICS 311615) encompasses 498 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 38,248 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.6 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.6 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 5 of 11
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Canton Plant Canton, OH D 4.3
Amick Farms, LLC SC Processing Plant Batesburg, SC D 4.3
Kessler'S Inc. Lemoyne, PA D 4.2
Decatur Fresh Plant Decatur, AL D 4.2
Pilgrim's Moorefield Fresh Plant Moorefield, WV D 4.2
OKF Fort Smith Plant 1 Fort Smith, AR D 4.2
Diestel Turkey Ranch Sonora, CA D 4.2
Arkansas Plant 1 Fort Smith, AR D 4.2
DG Foods, LLC Hazlehurst Hazlehurst, MS D 4.2
Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing Hazlehurst, MS D 4.2
West Liberty Foods Mount Pleasant, IA D 4.2
Mar-Jac Poultry AL, LLC Jasper, AL D 4.2
Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant Hattiesburg, MS D 4.1
George's Cassville Processing Plant Cassville, MO D 4.1
Mar-Jac Poultry, Inc Processing Plant Gainesville, GA D 4.1
Primary Poultry - Dayton VA Plant Dayton, VA D 4.0
Dorada Foods Reidsville Reidsville, NC D 4.0
Koch Foods Prepared Plant Morton, MS D 4.0
Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing Laurel, MS D 4.0
Pure Prairie Poultry Charles City, IA D 4.0
Culver Duck Farms, Inc. Middlebury, IN D 4.0
Johns Soules Foods Valley Alabama Valley, AL D 4.0
DG Foods Hazelhurst Hazlehurst, MS C 4.0
Dorada Foods Ponca City, OK C 4.0
Harrison Poultry Inc Bethlehem, GA C 3.9
SH Processing Plant St. Henry, OH C 3.9
Farmers Pride Inc / Bell & Evans Plant 2 Fredericksburg, PA C 3.9
PECO Foods West Point West Point, MS C 3.9
Sanderson Farms Collins Processing Collins, MS C 3.9
Peco Foods Inc. (Bay Springs Plant) Bay Springs, MS C 3.9
Farmers Pride Inc Plant 3 Fredericksburg, PA C 3.9
Brakebush Brothers, Inc. Westfield, WI C 3.9
Willmar Ave Plant Willmar, MN C 3.8
Koch Foods Morton, MS C 3.8
Pilgrims Pride Corp Canton, GA C 3.8
Peco Foods- West Point MS West Point, MS C 3.8
Cassville Processing Cassville, MO C 3.8
Murrayville Plant Murrayville, GA C 3.8
Pinnacle Plant /Allen Harim LLC Millsboro, DE C 3.8
Southern Hens, Inc. KP Moselle, MS C 3.8
Golden Rod Broilers Cullman, AL C 3.7
Pilgrims- Plant Natchitoches, LA C 3.7
Northern Pride, Inc. Thief River Falls, MN C 3.7
Arkansas Plant 2 Fort Smith, AR C 3.7
Pilgrim's Waco, TX C 3.7
OKF Fort Smith Plant 2 Fort Smith, AR C 3.6
TFC Poultry LLC Ashby, MN C 3.6
Rockmart Rockmart, GA C 3.6
Sensenig Turkey Farm LLC Lititz, PA C 3.6
FreeBird - East Facility Fredericksburg, PA C 3.6
← Prev Page 5 of 11 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food)?

This sector averages 4.6 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.