Industry profile · NAICS 812320

Collecting and distributing agents, laundry and drycleaning

Workplace injury rates across 233 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

233
Employers
5.1
Avg TCR
2.1
BLS benchmark
2,345
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Collecting and distributing agents, laundry and drycleaning average 5.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.1.

5.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.1
BLS national benchmark
233
employers reporting
2,345
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Collecting and distributing agents, laundry and drycleaning Safety Data Reveals

The Collecting and distributing agents, laundry and drycleaning sector (NAICS 812320) encompasses 233 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,345 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.1 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.1 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Collecting and distributing agents, laundry and drycleaning that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 4 of 6
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Drycleaner Jacksonville, FL B 1.5
Fersha Corp dba Shaffer Dry Cleaning & Laundry Tucson, AZ B 1.4
Feigenbaum Cleaners Glesn Falls, NY B 1.4
Lindemans Cleaning Inc Green Bay, WI B 1.4
Hart's Dry Cleaning Lexington, KY B 1.4
Gi-Ro Dry Cleaners, Inc Lockport, NY B 1.4
Main Plant - 01 Paducah, KY B 1.3
Wildman Business Group - Griffith Griffith, IN B 1.3
Florida Retail Fabricare Services, Inc Lakeland, FL B 1.2
Hallmark Cleaners Jackson, MS B 1.2
Columbia Plant Columbia, MO B 1.2
Marberry Cleaners St. Charles, IL B 1.2
BELMONT Youngstown, OH B 1.1
Christus Spohn Hospital Shoreline - Transport Corpus Christi, TX B 1.1
DMS Retail Enterprises, LLC dba Tide Cleaners Brecksville, OH B 1.1
Mesquite Country Enterprises LP San Antonio, TX B 1.1
BFC Nuuly Levittown, PA B 1.1
Meurice Garment Care Bronx, NY B 1.1
Sodexo at Nyc Hh Hotel Linen Program New York, NY A 1.0
North East Cleaners, Inc. Tonawanda, NY A 1.0
Mango Clean Inc. Seffner, FL A 1.0
Dry Cleaner/Laundry Lincoln, NE A 1.0
Hamlet Cleaners, Inc. Rockingham, NC A 0.8
Cheyenne Las Vegas, NV A 0.8
Hospital Cooperative Laundry Denver Denver, CO A 0.8
A Cleaner World Dry Cleaners Inc. Miami, FL A 0.8
Circle City Cleaners One, LLC Indianapolis, IN A 0.8
The First Finish Inc. Lynwood, CA A 0.7
Model Dry Cleaners, Charleroi Plant Charleroi, PA A 0.7
Tide Cleaners Dallas, TX A 0.6
CLS - Lima Lima, OH A 0.6
Virginia Textile Service, Inc. Petersburg, VA A 0.6
Ritz Grande Lakes Orlando, FL A 0.5
Green Apple Cleaners Lodi, NJ A 0.5
RKC Cleaners Corporation Elkgrove Village, IL A 0.5
Anthem Henderson, NV A 0.5
Village Cleaners North Syracuse, NY A 0.4
Arthur Copeland Cleaners Cedarhurst, NY A 0.4
Lansing Cleaners, INC Lansing, IL A 0.4
Charleston Las Vegas, NV A 0.2
Seattle HQ Seattle, WA A 0.2
Hallak Cleaners Hackensack, NJ A 0.2
C&C Clean Team Enterprises, LLC DBA Widmer's Cincinnati, OH A 0.1
Bicentennial Henderson, NV C 0.0
Specialty Quality Cleaners, Inc Canovanas, PR C 0.0
Hunt Cleaners Cozad, NE C 0.0
Pico Cleaners Los Angeles, CA C 0.0
Flora J Corporation Los Angeles, CA C 0.0
RKC Cleaners Corporation Wood Dale, IL C 0.0
Mulberrys Garment Care MN Roseville, MN C 0.0
← Prev Page 4 of 6 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Collecting and distributing agents, laundry and drycleaning?

This sector averages 5.1 against a BLS benchmark of 2.1 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.