Industry profile · NAICS 238290

Commercial-type door installation

Workplace injury rates across 1,325 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,325
Employers
2.9
Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
9,178
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Commercial-type door installation average 2.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.0 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.8.

2.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.8
BLS national benchmark
1,325
employers reporting
9,178
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Commercial-type door installation Safety Data Reveals

The Commercial-type door installation sector (NAICS 238290) encompasses 1,325 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 9,178 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Commercial-type door installation that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 17 of 27
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Allmark Door Company HQ Springfield, NJ A 1.2
NAV Industrial, Inc. Roanoke, VA A 1.2
Overhead Door Company of Washington, DC Beltsville, MD A 1.2
TK Elevator Urbandale Urbandale, IA A 1.2
Otis Elevator Company-San Francisco San Francisco, CA A 1.2
Otis Elevator Company-Chicago South Chicago, IL A 1.2
Miner Overhead Door Dallas Dallas, TX A 1.2
Advanced Industrial Services, LLC - Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH A 1.2
Tri-Cities Kennewick, WA A 1.2
Otis Elevator Company-Washington DC NE Lanham, MD A 1.2
D03 North New Jersey Morristown, NJ A 1.2
HSI Mechanical Inc Modesto, CA A 1.2
Associated Industrial Riggers Corp East Syracuse, NY A 1.2
Diebold Nixdorf Austin TX Austin, TX A 1.2
Mammoet Northern USA Inc. Swedesboro, NJ A 1.2
Lodige Greer Greer, SC A 1.2
TK Elevator St. Louis St. Louis, MO A 1.2
TK Elevator San Antonio San Antonio, TX A 1.2
Industrial Construction Services & Design, LLC. Factoryville, PA A 1.2
D66 South Florida Fort Lauderdale, FL A 1.2
Carter & Coggins Contracting DBA C & C Contracting Orlando, FL A 1.2
TK Elevator Louisville Louisville, KY A 1.2
Lakeside Mechanical Contractors Allegan, MI A 1.2
EnPro Industrial Services, LLC Geismar, LA A 1.2
Mechanical Contractors Inc Prior Lake, MN A 1.2
dormakaba - Randolph, MA Randolph, MA A 1.2
Otis Elevator Company-Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA A 1.2
MEI Rigging and Crating Albany, OR A 1.2
Piedmont Door Solutions Charlotte, NC A 1.2
Fullerton CA Fullerton, CA A 1.2
Otis Elevator Company-Albany Albany, NY A 1.2
Otis Elevator Company-East Hartford East Hartford, CT A 1.2
D48 Shreveport Shreveport, LA A 1.2
FHS / Mazzella Hoist & Crane Service Bartow, FL A 1.2
DC Equipment, Inc. Geraldine, AL A 1.1
TK Elevator Columbia Columbia, SC A 1.1
Otis Elevator Company-Tampa Tampa, FL A 1.1
D25 Cleveland Cleveland, OH A 1.1
Industrial Enterprises Inc. Jefferson City, MO A 1.1
D27 Columbus Columbus, OH A 1.1
Maine Corporate Lincoln, ME A 1.1
Diebold Nixdorf Hoover AL Hoover, AL A 1.1
D32 Washington DC Beltsville, MD A 1.1
Otis Elevator Company-Houston Houston, TX A 1.1
D88 Phoenix Chandler, AZ A 1.1
Schindler Clinton Escalator Plant Clinton, NC A 1.1
hth companies, inc. Union, MO A 1.1
QSI, Inc Bardstown, KY A 1.1
490-Sacramento Sacramento, CA A 1.1
Otis Elevator Company-Eastern Tennessee Nashville, TN A 1.1
← Prev Page 17 of 27 Next →

Safety grades are a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA and BLS data, not an official OSHA rating. Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Related

All industries → | Rankings →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Commercial-type door installation?

This sector averages 2.9 against a BLS benchmark of 2.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.