Industry profile · NAICS 238290

Commercial-type door installation

Workplace injury rates across 1,325 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,325
Employers
2.9
Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
9,178
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Commercial-type door installation average 2.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.0 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.8.

2.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.8
BLS national benchmark
1,325
employers reporting
9,178
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Commercial-type door installation Safety Data Reveals

The Commercial-type door installation sector (NAICS 238290) encompasses 1,325 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 9,178 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Commercial-type door installation that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 6 of 27
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Diebold Nixdorf Greenwood Village CO Greenwood Village, CO D 4.1
WMATA Upper Malboro, MD D 4.1
George M. Wildasin, C.E., Inc. New Oxford, PA D 4.1
Cmf Group Inc. Madison Heights, MI D 4.1
U.S. Materials Handling Corp Utica, NY D 4.0
Innovative Skilled Trades Auburn, IN D 4.0
Vortex Industries - Commerce Commerce, CA D 4.0
Vortex Industries - SCC San Jose, CA D 4.0
Legion Industrial Bowling Green, MO D 4.0
BMSI Paul, ID D 4.0
Mid-States Millwright & Builders, Inc. Nevada, IA D 4.0
Vortex Industries - San Diego San Diego, CA D 4.0
650-Milwaukee Cudahy, WI D 4.0
Fort Smith Fort Smith, AR D 4.0
R.L. Insulation Co., Inc. Hopewell, PA D 4.0
Otis Elevator Company-Chicago Sub Lombard, IL D 4.0
Machinery Movers & Erectors Inc. DBA BRC Mechanical Services Providence Forge, VA D 3.9
DKB, Inc. Montana Branch Billings, MT D 3.9
TK Elevator Chicago Downer'S Grove, IL D 3.9
DH Pace Door Services - Omaha La Vista, NE D 3.9
D&H United Fueling Solutions, Inc Lubbock, TX D 3.9
Industrial Construction & Associates Racine, WI D 3.9
American Industrial Door LLC Central Point, OR D 3.9
Overhead Door Company of St. Louis Maryland Heights, MO D 3.9
M Nakai Repair Service, Ltd. Honolulu, HI D 3.9
Anchor Insulation- RI Industrial/Mechanical- IBP Branch 302/303 East Providence, RI D 3.8
Tee Jay Service Company Aurora, IL D 3.8
Access Elevators, Inc. Cudahy, WI D 3.8
Otis Elevator Company-DC NE Lanham, MD D 3.8
Virginia Riggers Inc. Winchester, VA D 3.8
Vortex Colorado - SLC Salt Lake City, UT D 3.8
Diebold Nixdorf Sacramento CA Sacramento, CA D 3.8
DFW Movers North Jobsites Fort Worth, TX D 3.8
Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB New York, NY D 3.7
Right Elevator Johnstown, PA D 3.7
Aerocom Systems, LLC Flowery Branch, GA D 3.7
Walker Crane & Rigging Corp. Plainville, CT D 3.6
Advanced Industrial Services York, PA D 3.6
Barclay Mechanical Services, Inc. Paul, ID D 3.6
D&H United Fueling Solutions TULSA OK Tulsa, OK D 3.6
DOUBLE CHECK Kansas City D&H United Fueling Solutions Kansas City, MO D 3.6
DH Pace Company Inc. dba Ankmar - Denver Denver, CO D 3.6
John Wendt ET AL Wabash, IN D 3.6
Insulation Solutions, Inc. Dundalk, MD D 3.6
Diebold Nixdorf Uniontown OH Uniontown, OH D 3.6
TK Elevator Tulsa Tulsa, OK D 3.6
D52 Denver Lakewood, CO D 3.6
TK Elevator Greensboro Greensboro, NC D 3.5
thyssenkrupp Elevator San Diego El Cajon, CA D 3.5
110-Denver Englewood, CO D 3.5
← Prev Page 6 of 27 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Commercial-type door installation?

This sector averages 2.9 against a BLS benchmark of 2.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.