Industry profile · NAICS 485111

Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination)

Workplace injury rates across 386 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

386
Employers
6.8
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
19,501
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) average 6.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.5 times the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

6.8
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
386
employers reporting
19,501
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) Safety Data Reveals

The Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) sector (NAICS 485111) encompasses 386 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 19,501 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 6.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 6.8 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 8 of 10
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
55331 55344 55620 Brockport, RIT, Univ of Rochester Rochester, NY B 2.6
Alexandria Rail Facility/Telegraph Road Alexandria, VA B 2.5
Lakeland Bus Lines Inc Dover, NJ B 2.5
Kansas City, MO - NE Birmingham Kansas City, MO B 2.5
First Student 22043/Helena Helena, MT B 2.5
SMCTD-North Base Bus Maintenance South San Francisco, CA B 2.5
2128 Rca Desplaines Blue Line Chicago, IL B 2.4
Fresno, CA - S. Peach Avenue Fresno, CA B 2.4
Norfolk Tide Facility Hampton, VA A 2.3
Gateway Los Angeles, CA A 2.2
1953-3153 Chicago, IL A 2.2
ACI-HERZOG A Joint Venture Guaynabo, PR A 2.2
55825 - Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, MN A 2.2
6091-372 San Marcos, TX A 2.1
722 Nc State Raleigh, NC A 2.1
Lithia Springs, GA - Sydney Court Lithia Springs, GA A 2.1
1953-3152 Chicago, IL A 2.1
Seymour,IN - East 4th Street Seymour, IN A 2.0
Shelbyville, TN -- Cedar King Raod Shelbyville, TN A 2.0
Royal Excursion Mishawaka, IN A 2.0
Victorville, CA - Nisqualli Road Victorville, CA A 2.0
Streetsboro, OH - Philipp Pkwy Streetsboro, OH A 1.9
4074 Electricians Chicago, IL A 1.9
57222 Allegany County Transit Cuba, NY A 1.8
2240 Blue Line Support Chicago, IL A 1.8
4254 Rail Station Mgt Support B P Chicago, IL A 1.8
55371 Canby Canby, OR A 1.7
2251 Midway Maintenance Chicago, IL A 1.7
St. Louis, MO - Lynch St St. Louis, MO A 1.7
Carrolton, TX - Josey Lane Carrolton, TX A 1.7
Facilities 20th St Portland, OR A 1.6
Parsons, KS-Superior Drive Parsons, KS A 1.6
4132 Substation Maintenance Chicago, IL A 1.6
55374 LA Access Lancaster, CA A 1.6
Rancho Cucamonga, CA - Jersey BI Rancho Cucamonga, CA A 1.6
Harlingen, TX - E Harrison Ave Harlingen, TX A 1.6
Winchester, VA-Park Center Drive Winchester, VA A 1.6
Walpole, MA - Walpole Park South Walpole, MA A 1.5
First Student Silverton, OR A 1.5
Jackson, MS- Boling St Jackson, MS A 1.5
3153 Bus Instruction Chicago, IL A 1.5
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority - River Oaks San Jose, CA A 1.4
General Office Building GOB Newark, NJ A 1.4
2220 Red Yellow Purple Line Support Chicago, IL A 1.4
2104 Rca Rosemont Blue Line Rosemont, IL A 1.4
Joppa, MD - Philadelphia, PA Joppa, MD A 1.3
Location 60 Los Angeles, CA A 1.2
Midlothian, TX - Rail Port Parkway Midlothian, TX A 1.2
San Mateo County Transit District San Carlos, CA A 1.2
Fife, WA- Valley Avenue Fife, WA A 1.2
← Prev Page 8 of 10 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination)?

This sector averages 6.8 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.