Industry profile · NAICS 562910

Environmental remediation services

Workplace injury rates across 829 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

829
Employers
3.0
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
3,921
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Environmental remediation services average 3.0 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.2 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

3.0
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
829
employers reporting
3,921
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Environmental remediation services Safety Data Reveals

The Environmental remediation services sector (NAICS 562910) encompasses 829 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 3,921 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.0 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.0 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Environmental remediation services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 16 of 20
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
HPC Industrial Services LLC H4050 Deer Park, TX C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H4120 Deer Park, TX C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H601 Deer Park, TX C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H377 Deer Park, TX C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H24 Midland, MI C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H219 Tulsa, OK C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H104 Port Arthur, TX C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H4276 Port Arthur, TX C 0.0
NC Water and Fire Restoration Inc Fayetteville, NC C 0.0
Global Green Service Group Dearborn Heights, MI C 0.0
NW Contracting Alden, NY C 0.0
American Pollution Control Corp New Iberia, LA C 0.0
Environmental Technology System Inc. Brooklyn, NY C 0.0
Capital Energy Group, LLC Knoxville, TN C 0.0
Eco Bay Services SoCal Santa Fe Springs, CA C 0.0
Pacific Environmental Corporation HI Honolulu, HI C 0.0
Resolute Environmental & Response Services, LLC Baytown, TX C 0.0
Wallace Industrial Technology, Inc. Concord, NC C 0.0
Rico Rico, CO C 0.0
Curtis and Son Companies Liberty, TX C 0.0
EISCO Swedesboro Branch Swedesboro, NJ C 0.0
American Tank Wash Creola, AL C 0.0
Albany NY Altamont, NY C 0.0
Chicago IL Griffith, IN C 0.0
New England Lab Pack Woonsocket, RI C 0.0
Norfolk MA Norfolk, MA C 0.0
Skowhegan ME Skowhegan, ME C 0.0
Trans PA, PA Lbpk Lewisberry, PA C 0.0
OFRS, Inc Signal Hill, CA C 0.0
Livonia Engineering Livonia, MI C 0.0
Manhattan Engineering New York, NY C 0.0
Fairfield NJ Engineering Fairfield, NJ C 0.0
Portland Engineering South Portland, ME C 0.0
Providence Engineering Providence, RI C 0.0
SRI Engineering Norwood, MA C 0.0
Technical Services FAA Technical Center US NJ Atlantic City NJ NJ991 Atlantic City, NJ C 0.0
TS Offices US TN Oak Ridge TN TN997 Oak Ridge, TN C 0.0
Montrose Environmental Group Inc. and Affiliates: Portland-ECT2 Portland, ME C 0.0
HPC Industrial Group LLC H4228 Nitro, WV C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H1143 Benicia, CA C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H2003 Long Beach, CA C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H4040 Ashland, KY C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H4110 Ashland, KY C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H4130 Deer Park, TX C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H4207 Plaquemine, LA C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H4230 East Chicago, IN C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H4251 Salt Lake City, UT C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H4253 Freeport, TX C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H4275 Port Arthur, TX C 0.0
HPC Industrial Services LLC H967 Deer Park, TX C 0.0
← Prev Page 16 of 20 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Environmental remediation services?

This sector averages 3.0 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.