Industry profile · NAICS 923120

Health program administration

Workplace injury rates across 262 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

262
Employers
3.0
Avg TCR
3.2
BLS benchmark
3,328
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Health program administration average 3.0 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.2.

3.0
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.2
BLS national benchmark
262
employers reporting
3,328
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Health program administration Safety Data Reveals

The Health program administration sector (NAICS 923120) encompasses 262 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 3,328 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.0 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.0 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Health program administration that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 7
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Behavioral Health Merced, CA D 4.7
HCA - BHS/AOABH Outpatient Administration Santa Ana, CA D 4.7
Minnesota Department of Health - St. Cloud Office St. Cloud, MN D 4.7
Dept. of Health & Social Services (12) Anchorage, AK D 4.6
Dept. of Health & Social Services (77) Palmer, AK D 4.5
Tazewell County Health Department Tremont, IL D 4.5
Minnesota Department of Health - Fergus Falls Office Fergus Falls, MN D 4.5
Health & Human Services Agency Willows, CA D 4.5
Public Health Martinez, CA D 4.4
Dept. of Health & Social Services (22) Bethel, AK D 4.2
AuSable Valley Community Mental Health Tawas, MI D 4.2
Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260) Phoenix, AZ D 4.1
King County Public Health Seattle, WA D 4.1
CAN076-PHFE-CAN076 San Francisco, CA D 4.0
Hca - Ph/Dce/Pds Santa Ana, CA D 3.9
Crown Point Grass Valley, CA D 3.9
HCA - Public Health Clinics/Family Health Division - 17th St WIC Santa Ana, CA C 3.8
Dept. of Health & Social Services (56) Kenai, AK C 3.8
EMHS - Cumberland Bangor, ME C 3.8
Dept. of Health & Social Services (76) Sitka, AK C 3.8
McLean County Health Department Bloomington, IL C 3.7
Dept. of Health & Social Services (14) Anchorage, AK C 3.7
Brighton Greens Resource Center Grass Valley, CA C 3.7
CRWC Orland, CA C 3.6
DuPage County Health Department Wheaton, IL C 3.6
Maricopa County - Environmental Services (880) Phoenix, AZ C 3.6
CMS Telstar El Monte, CA C 3.5
Behavioral Health San Bernardino, CA C 3.5
Dept. of Health & Social Services (29) Fairbanks, AK C 3.4
Public Health Department Merced, CA C 3.4
Central Management Services Springfield, IL C 3.4
Indiana Department of Health - 2N Indianapolis, IN C 3.4
Hca - Crisis Stabilization Unit (Csu) Santa Ana, CA C 3.3
Dept. of Health (51) Wasilla, AK C 3.3
Dept. of Health & Social Services (7) Anchorage, AK C 3.3
Indiana Department of Health - Labs Indianapolis, IN C 3.3
Dept. of Health & Social Services (81) Sitka, AK C 3.2
Hd2 - Health Tucson, AZ C 3.2
Madison County Health Department Edwardsville, IL C 3.1
City of New Haven - Health Department New Haven, CT C 3.1
Dept. of Health & Social Services (9) Anchorage, AK C 3.1
CAN016-PHFE-CAN016 San Francisco, CA C 3.1
Anchorage Health Department Anchorage, AK C 3.0
Coos Health & Wellness Coos Bay, OR C 3.0
6935-Health-Health Dept Charlotte, NC C 3.0
Dept. of Health & Social Services (33) Fairbanks, AK C 3.0
Hhsa #2 Orland, CA C 3.0
San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department Stockton, CA C 3.0
Modesto Modesto, CA C 2.9
Rocky River Gardens Cleveland, OH C 2.9
← Prev Page 2 of 7 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Health program administration?

This sector averages 3.0 against a BLS benchmark of 3.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.