Industry profile · NAICS 333242

Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 152 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

152
Employers
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
1,332
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing average 1.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

1.8
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
152
employers reporting
1,332
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing sector (NAICS 333242) encompasses 152 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 1,332 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.8 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Vapor Technologies, Inc. Longmont, CO A 1.6
Lam Research Corp Chandler Field Office Chandler, AZ A 1.6
Brooks Automation, Inc. Cambridge, MA A 1.6
Diamonex Allentown, PA A 1.5
Gpd Global, Inc. Grand Junction, CO A 1.5
Daifuku America Clean Room - Oregon Hillsboro, OR A 1.4
Absolics Inc Covington, GA A 1.4
ASM NEXX Inc. Billerica, MA A 1.4
Wright Industries Inc., (Elm Hill Pike) Nashville, TN A 1.4
CASU57, Applied Materials Sunnyvale, CA A 1.4
ASM-NEXX, Inc. Billerica, MA A 1.3
RENA Technologies North America LLC- Albany Location Albany, OR A 1.3
Chandler Tea Chandler, AZ A 1.3
Daifuku America eFA Division Chandler, AZ A 1.2
USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites) Santa Clara, CA A 1.2
MKS Methuen Methuen, MA A 1.2
SPT Microtechnologies USA San Jose, CA A 1.2
Stainless Design Concepts Saugerties, NY A 1.2
ALOCLEK Hillsboro TEA Hillsboro, OR A 1.2
MTK01, Applied Materials, Semi Tool Main Kalispell, MT A 1.1
Lam Research Corp Boise Field Office Boise, ID A 1.1
Little Enterprises LLC Ipswich, MA A 1.1
Akrion Technologies Allentown, PA A 1.0
MKS Lawrence Lawrence, MA A 1.0
BTU N Billerica N Billerica, MA A 1.0
Analog Devices Beaverton, OR A 1.0
Lehi Tea Lehi, UT A 1.0
Axcelis Beverly Beverly, MA A 1.0
SPTS San Jose, CA A 1.0
RoMan Manufacturing, Inc. Grand Rapids, MI A 0.9
MAVAR1 Gloucester, MA A 0.9
MAVAR1 - Varian Campus, Applied Materials Gloucester, MA A 0.9
Veeco Process Equipoment Inc. San Jose, CA A 0.9
MKS Shattuck Rd Andover, MA A 0.8
Reliant Systems, Inc. Zimmerman, MN A 0.8
Mycronic Tewksbury, MA A 0.8
Electro Scientific Industries Inc - Portland, OR Portland, OR A 0.8
NYALB 01 - Nano Fab, IBM - Albany Albany, NY A 0.8
Nikon Precision, Inc. Belmont, CA A 0.8
MeiVac Incorporated San Jose, CA A 0.8
Breinigsville Breinigsville, PA A 0.7
TXAME Campus Austin, TX A 0.7
RASIRC San Diego, CA A 0.7
Maxim Integrated Beaverton, OR A 0.7
Brooks Automation US, LLC. Chelmsford, MA A 0.7
MKS Beaverton Beaverton, OR A 0.6
ORHI02 Hillsboro, OR A 0.6
Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus Tualatin, OR A 0.6
Applied Materials Austin, TX A 0.6
MTKA01 Kalispell, MT A 0.5
← Prev Page 2 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing?

This sector averages 1.8 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.