Industry profile · NAICS 444180
Other Building Material Dealers
Workplace injury rates across 317 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.
- 317
- Employers
- 3.7
- Avg TCR
- 3.4
- BLS benchmark
- 2,358
- Injuries
The industry picture
Employers in Other Building Material Dealers average 3.7 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.1 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.4.
- 3.7
- avg TCR · reporting employers
- 3.4
- BLS national benchmark
- 317
- employers reporting
- 2,358
- recordable injuries
OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.
What Other Building Material Dealers Safety Data Reveals
The Other Building Material Dealers sector (NAICS 444180) encompasses 317 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,358 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.7 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.4 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.7 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.
The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Other Building Material Dealers that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.
Employers in this industry, by injury rate
Page 6 of 7| Employer | Location | Grade | Avg TCR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jacksonville NC Yard | Jacksonville, NC | A | 1.1 |
| Congers NY Yard | Congers, NY | A | 1.0 |
| Dayton OH Yard | Vandalia, OH | A | 1.0 |
| Be Mor | Hughes Springs, TX | A | 1.0 |
| College Station TX Yard | College Station, TX | A | 1.0 |
| Katy TX Yard | Katy, TX | A | 1.0 |
| Specialty Appliance GWV | Greenwood Village, CO | A | 1.0 |
| Fife WA Yard | Tacoma, WA | A | 0.9 |
| Baltimore-Washington Mkt Install | Point of Rocks, MD | A | 0.9 |
| Petoskey MI Yard | Petoskey, MI | A | 0.9 |
| Carbondale CO Yard | Carbondale, CO | A | 0.9 |
| Johnston County NC Yard | Garner, NC | A | 0.9 |
| Glendale AZ Yard | Glendale, AZ | A | 0.8 |
| Durango CO Yard | Durango, CO | A | 0.8 |
| East Apex NC Yard | Apex, NC | A | 0.8 |
| Huntsville AL Yard | Huntsville, AL | A | 0.8 |
| Denver CO Yard | Denver, CO | A | 0.8 |
| FPG Wholesale, Inc | Miami, FL | A | 0.8 |
| Orem UT Yard | Orem, UT | A | 0.7 |
| R.P. Lumber Co. - Hillsboro | Hillsboro, IL | A | 0.7 |
| Las Vegas NV Yard (Range Rd) | Las Vegas, NV | A | 0.7 |
| Reuther Manufacturing Company | Succasunna, NJ | A | 0.6 |
| Issaquah WA Yard | Issaquah, WA | A | 0.6 |
| New Braunfels TX Yard | New Braunfels, TX | A | 0.6 |
| Monroe NC Yard | Monroe, NC | A | 0.5 |
| Rosenberg TX Yard | Rosenberg, TX | A | 0.5 |
| Central TX Sales Admin | Helotes, TX | A | 0.5 |
| Delaware OH Yard | Delaware, OH | A | 0.4 |
| R.P. Lumber Co. - Staunton | Staunton, IL | A | 0.4 |
| Chace Building Supply | Foxboro, MA | A | 0.4 |
| Charleston SC Yard | Charleston, WV | C | 0.0 |
| Kingsport TN Yard | Mount Carmel, TN | C | 0.0 |
| Emmittsburg MD Design | Emmitsburg, MD | C | 0.0 |
| Yakima WA Yard | Union Gap, WA | C | 0.0 |
| Mandan ND Yard | Mandan, ND | C | 0.0 |
| Albuquerque NM Yard | Albuquerque, NM | C | 0.0 |
| Northeast Truss Designer Admin Center | Elkwood, VA | C | 0.0 |
| Georgetown DE Yard | Georgetown, DE | C | 0.0 |
| Layton UT Yard | Layton, UT | C | 0.0 |
| Kingston WA Yard | Kingston, WA | C | 0.0 |
| Hollywood CA Yard | Los Angeles, CA | C | 0.0 |
| Mar Vista CA Yard | Los Angeles, CA | C | 0.0 |
| Pueblo CO Yard | Pueblo, CO | C | 0.0 |
| South Atlantic Design Group | Plant City, FL | C | 0.0 |
| Meridian ID Yard | Meridian, ID | C | 0.0 |
| Duncanville TX Yard | Duncanville, TX | C | 0.0 |
| Hurst TX Yard | Hurst, TX | C | 0.0 |
| 7221_16538 | Green Bay, WI | C | 0.0 |
| Santa Rosa Beach FL Yard | Santa Rosa Beach, FL | C | 0.0 |
| Lakeville MN Yard | Lakeville, MN | C | 0.0 |
Safety grades are a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA and BLS data, not an official OSHA rating. Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Working in Other Building Material Dealers?
This sector averages 3.7 against a BLS benchmark of 3.4 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.
- Look up a specific employer in this industry, not just the sector average. Look up an employer
- See how this industry ranks against every other sector. Industry rankings
- Learn what an A-to-F grade requires within an industry benchmark. How grades work
Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.