Industry profile · NAICS 562920

Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream

Workplace injury rates across 374 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

374
Employers
5.0
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
4,481
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream average 5.0 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.9 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

5.0
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
374
employers reporting
4,481
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream Safety Data Reveals

The Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream sector (NAICS 562920) encompasses 374 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 4,481 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.0 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.0 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 10
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Revolution Recovery LLC Philadelphia, PA F 9.4
CORE Staffing, LLC Portland, OR F 9.4
Carpet Recycling #1- AZ Phoenix, AZ F 9.3
Crinc Des Moines, IA F 9.3
Casella Springfield Springfield, MA F 9.2
Cascade Asset Management - Indianapolis Indianapolis, IN F 9.2
Ecovery, LLC Loxley, AL F 9.2
Marpan Recycling LLC Tallahassee, FL F 9.1
Airmont Airmount, NY F 9.1
Cedar Poly, LLC Tipton, IA F 9.1
Area Recycling, Inc. Pekin, IL F 9.0
Parallel Products of Florida Dade City, FL F 8.9
Santa Fe Springs Santa Fe Spring, CA F 8.9
S09802 - WM Recycling Brevard Cocoa, FL F 8.8
Sims Recycling Solutions Roseville, CA F 8.8
Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC Minneapolis, MN F 8.8
Arc Allegany-Steuben- Redemption Center Wellsville, NY F 8.8
Dynamic Onalaska Campus Onalaska, WI F 8.7
MRF Oakland Wood Oakland, CA F 8.7
DTG Enterprises, Inc. - Renton Renton, WA F 8.7
Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County Madison, WI F 8.6
Western NY BICS Lancaster, NY F 8.6
St Pete St. Petersburg, FL F 8.4
Zero Waste One LLC dba United Recycling Seattle, WA F 8.3
S05725 - Lodi Recycling Lodi, CA F 8.3
Chino (ENV) Chino, CA F 8.2
Hutchins Facility Hutchins, TX F 8.2
AAA Standard Services Toledo, OH F 7.9
Green Works Inc. Detroit, MI F 7.9
Sun Recycling Beltsville, MD F 7.9
Portland - Commerce St Portland, OR F 7.7
Balcones Recycling- Austin Austin, TX F 7.7
Indianapolis - 96th St Indianapolis, IN F 7.7
Plastic Recycling Inc. Indianapolis, IN F 7.6
Dayton Material Recovery Facility Dayton, OH F 7.6
Agricultural Services, Inc. Texarkana, TX F 7.5
Fremont Recycling & Transfer Station Fremont, CA F 7.5
North Texas Recycling Center Fort Worth, TX F 7.4
West Rock Recycling - Shared staff Knoxville, TN F 7.4
DTG Enterprises, Inc. - Spectrum Woodinville, WA F 7.3
Empire Recycling-Utica Utica, NY F 7.3
G&F Recycling Newark, NJ F 7.2
Balcones Recycling, Inc.. - Dallas Division Farmers Branch, TX F 7.2
Canon Environmental Technologies Incorporated Gloucester, VA F 7.2
Rapid Recycling, Inc. Oaks, PA F 7.2
Minneapolis MRF Minneapolis, MN F 7.0
Seattle - 3rd Ave Seattle, WA F 7.0
S05652 - Dallas Container Shop Dallas, TX F 6.9
East Hazel Crest East Hazel Crest, IL F 6.9
Entech, Inc Middlebury, IN F 6.9
← Prev Page 2 of 10 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream?

This sector averages 5.0 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.