Industry profile · NAICS 325620

Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 275 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

275
Employers
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
5,022
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing average 3.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

3.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
275
employers reporting
5,022
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing sector (NAICS 325620) encompasses 275 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 5,022 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.2 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 6
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Beauty Quest Group Rantoul, IL D 4.4
Ramm Beauty Inc Orangeburg, NY D 4.4
Givaudan Fragrances Corporation- Towaco Towaco, NJ D 4.3
Dhaliwal Labs LLC Dallas, TX D 4.3
Thibiant International Chatsworth, CA D 4.3
Wasatch Product Development LLC Draper, UT D 4.3
HK Kolmar USA Olyphant, PA D 4.2
Process Technologies and Packaging Scott Township, PA D 4.1
Hayward Laboratories Inc. East Stroudsburg, PA D 4.1
Pharmasol South Easton, MA D 4.1
The Gillette Company, LLC - North Chicago Plant North Chicago, IL D 4.1
Strength of Nature Savannah, GA D 4.0
Sigan America, LLC Ottawa, IL D 4.0
SON Manufacturing Plant Savannah, GA C 3.9
Henkel US Operations Corporation Geneva, NY C 3.9
Mary Kay, Inc. (ASRS) Dallas, TX C 3.9
ChemAid Laboratories Inc Saddle Brook, NJ C 3.9
JPMS Manufacturing LLC Reading, PA C 3.8
Strength of Nature Distribution Center Pooler, GA C 3.8
Zotos International Inc. Geneva, NY C 3.8
Schwan Cosmetics USA Murfreesboro, TN C 3.8
3C, LLC (Hague Rd.) Indianapolis, IN C 3.8
Vee Pak - Hodgkins, IL Hodgkins, IL C 3.8
5755_12560 Gilsum, NH C 3.7
Bentley Labs Edison, NJ C 3.7
Central Cortland, NY C 3.7
Dimensional Merchandising Inc. Wharton, NJ C 3.6
Prima Fleur Botanicals Novato, CA C 3.6
Avlon Industries, Inc Melrose Park, IL C 3.6
3202 Queens Blvd Long Island City, NY C 3.5
Pennbright Houston, TX C 3.5
Classic Cosmetics, Inc. Chatsworth, CA C 3.5
Precise Packaging LLC. Fall River, MA C 3.4
Capsum Inc Del Valle, TX C 3.4
Naturich Cosmetique Labs, Inc. Garland, TX C 3.4
Renfield Manufacturing Reno, NV C 3.4
BMSC Coppell, TX C 3.4
Cellese, Inc. Headquarters Irvine, CA C 3.4
Orlandi, Inc Farmingdale, NY C 3.4
Overmyer Plant Jacksonville, FL C 3.3
Concept Laboratories Chicago, IL C 3.3
Liquid Technologies, Inc. Chino, CA C 3.3
Cosmos Corporation St. Peters, MO C 3.3
EStyle Corp LLC Jacksonville, FL C 3.3
rosa west North Hollywood, CA C 3.2
SON Global Distribution Center Pooler, GA C 3.2
KDC/One Cosmetic Laboratories of America Inc. Chatsworth, CA C 3.2
PLZ Corp Indianapolis, IN C 3.1
Holmdel Holmdel, NJ C 3.1
McKenna Labs Inc. Fullerton, CA C 3.1
← Prev Page 2 of 6 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing?

This sector averages 3.2 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.