Industry profile · NAICS 333318

Wash water recycling machinery manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 415 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

415
Employers
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
5,430
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Wash water recycling machinery manufacturing average 3.4 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.0 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

3.4
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
415
employers reporting
5,430
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Wash water recycling machinery manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Wash water recycling machinery manufacturing sector (NAICS 333318) encompasses 415 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 5,430 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.4 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.4 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Wash water recycling machinery manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 4 of 9
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
J.V. Manufacturing, Inc (Springdale AR) Springdale, AR C 3.1
Auto Butler DBA Broadway Equipment Company Minneapolis, MN C 3.1
Fort Rucker 01F, AL Fort Rucker, AL C 3.1
Fairfield IA Fairfield, IA C 3.0
Culligan: Distribution, QA, & Returned Goods Libertyville, IL C 3.0
Domestic Linen Supply and Laundry Co. Detroit, MI C 3.0
Veolia WTS Minnetonka, MN C 3.0
Whirlpool Corporation - Fall River Fall River, MA C 3.0
Delfield Mt. Pleasant, MI C 3.0
Evoqua Water Technologies Thomasville Thomasville, GA C 3.0
National Carwash Solutions Grimes, IA C 2.9
Tennant Company Plant 1 Golden Valley, MN C 2.9
Retail Creston, IA C 2.9
Materials Transportation Company Temple, TX C 2.9
A. O. Smith Groveport Groveport, OH C 2.9
Chemical Methods Associates, LLC Garden Grove, CA C 2.9
FL - Invision Orlando, FL C 2.8
Nicholson Manufacturing, Inc Ixonia, WI C 2.8
Pellerin Milnor Kenner, LA C 2.8
Philadelphia Broomall, PA C 2.8
Marathon Equipment - Vernon Vernon, AL C 2.8
BUNN - Stevenson Drive Springfield, IL C 2.8
Blue Water Environmental Auburn Hills, MI C 2.8
Karcher North America Aurora, CO C 2.8
New York Kew Gardens, NY C 2.8
Suez WTS Services USA, Inc. FSC Fontana, CA C 2.8
Duperon Corporation Saginaw, MI C 2.7
Sioux Corporation Beresford, SD C 2.7
Royal Range of Ca, Inc. Eastvale, CA C 2.7
Metal Masters Foodservice Clayton, DE C 2.7
The Broaster Company Beloit, WI C 2.7
Alliance Manufacturing, Inc. Fond Du Lac, WI C 2.7
Karcher - Camas Camas, WA B 2.6
Hunter Engineering Company - Raymond Raymond, MS B 2.6
Ash Grove Drive Springfield, IL B 2.6
Mar Cor Purification - Skippack, PA Skippack, PA B 2.6
RP Visuals/ASG - Anaheim Anaheim, CA B 2.6
Mar Cor Purification - Needham Heights Needham Heights, MA B 2.6
Geerpres Inc Muskegon, MI B 2.5
Honey Brook Honey Brook, PA B 2.5
A. O. Smith Water Treatment (North America), Inc. Haltom City, TX B 2.5
OCE-OSP Outside Salem, OR B 2.5
Kewley Building Newbury, OH B 2.5
Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters Bridgeton, MO B 2.4
Evoqua Water Technologies Holland Holland, MI B 2.4
Sally Corporation Jacksonville, FL B 2.4
MEIKO USA, Inc. Nashville Lavergne, TN B 2.3
Vamco LTD Inc. Lindsay, CA B 2.3
Martin Yale Industries LLC Wabash, IN B 2.3
Garnsey Santa Ana, CA B 2.3
← Prev Page 4 of 9 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Wash water recycling machinery manufacturing?

This sector averages 3.4 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.