Industry profile · NAICS 221310

Water supply systems

Workplace injury rates across 836 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

836
Employers
5.2
Avg TCR
1.2
BLS benchmark
13,051
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Water supply systems average 5.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 4.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 1.2.

5.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
1.2
BLS national benchmark
836
employers reporting
13,051
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Water supply systems Safety Data Reveals

The Water supply systems sector (NAICS 221310) encompasses 836 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 13,051 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 1.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.2 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Water supply systems that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 10 of 17
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Vandenberg Air Force Base Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA F 3.1
Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency Santa Clarita, CA F 3.1
Water/Public Works, Public Utiities Joliet, IL F 3.1
Robert Diemer Treatment Plant Yorba Linda, CA F 3.1
Water Administration Building Cedar Rapids, IA F 3.1
Sedona office Sedona, AZ F 3.0
Startex-Jackson-Wellford-Duncan Water District Wellford, SC F 3.0
Water District Management Co., Inc. Houston, TX F 3.0
Rathbun Regional Water Association - Rathbun WT/Admin Centerville, IA F 3.0
Infrastrucutre Alternatives Rockford, MI F 3.0
City of Chesapeake - Lake Gaston Water Treatment Plant Chesapeake, VA F 3.0
Utilities Inc., of Louisiana Mandeville, LA F 3.0
Portland Water Bureau Resource Protection Portland, OR F 3.0
Aqua NJ Hamilton, NJ F 3.0
Sunrise Water Authority Happy Valley, OR F 3.0
BWS-Beretania Complex Honolulu, HI F 3.0
6066 - San Antonio San Antonio, TX F 3.0
MOA AWWU Ship Creek Water Treatment Facility Anchorage, AK F 3.0
EPCOR Chaparral City Water, EPCOR Paradise Valley Water Fountain Hiils, AZ F 2.9
Denham Springs Denham Springs, LA F 2.9
Cleveland Utilities - Water/Wastewater Division Cleveland, TN F 2.9
Aqua North Carolina Cary, NC F 2.9
Aqua New Jersey, Inc. - Hamilton Hamilton, NJ F 2.9
Water Pollution Control Plant Sunnyvale, CA F 2.9
Department of Public Utilities - Water Naperville, IL F 2.9
Jefferson City WTP Jefferson City, MO F 2.9
Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville Greenville, SC F 2.9
Connecticut Water Clinton, CT F 2.8
Joshua Basin Water District - Office Joshua Tree, CA F 2.8
WSSC Water Laurel, MD F 2.8
Total Environment Solutions - Duson Duson, LA F 2.8
PLW The Woodlands, TX F 2.8
UTY - New York - West Nyack,NY West Nyack, NY F 2.8
Fairfax County Water Authority Fairfax, VA F 2.8
Covington Water District Covington, WA F 2.8
Schwing Bioset Somerset, WI F 2.8
All Locations Delaware, OH F 2.8
Aqua Virginia Rockville, VA F 2.8
Administration Flint, MI F 2.8
Plainfield OPS Plainfield, NJ F 2.7
The Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston Charleston, SC F 2.7
New Jersey American Water-Farmingdale Farmingdale, NJ F 2.7
F.E. Weymouth Filtration Plant La Verne, CA F 2.7
Orange County Water District Fountain Valley, CA F 2.7
South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority New Haven, CT F 2.7
NRV Regional Water Authority Radford, VA F 2.7
City of Chicago - Department of Water Management - 9536 S Genoa Ave Chicago, IL F 2.7
Camrosa Water District Camarillo, CA F 2.7
GS Construction Inc Lawrenceville, GA F 2.6
Idaho Boise, ID F 2.6
← Prev Page 10 of 17 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Water supply systems?

This sector averages 5.2 against a BLS benchmark of 1.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.