Industry profile · NAICS 221310

Water supply systems

Workplace injury rates across 836 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

836
Employers
5.2
Avg TCR
1.2
BLS benchmark
13,051
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Water supply systems average 5.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 4.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 1.2.

5.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
1.2
BLS national benchmark
836
employers reporting
13,051
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Water supply systems Safety Data Reveals

The Water supply systems sector (NAICS 221310) encompasses 836 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 13,051 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 1.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.2 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Water supply systems that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 11 of 17
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
USFL Clermont Clermont, FL F 2.6
City of Chicago - Department of Water Management -1000 E Ohio St Chicago, IL F 2.6
Pacific Grove Pacific Grove, CA F 2.6
Swainsboro GA Swainsboro, GA F 2.6
UTY - New Jersey - Highlands,NJ Highland Lakes, NJ F 2.6
Truckee Meadows Water Authority Reno, NV F 2.6
West Point Highland Falls, NY F 2.6
Pennichuck Water Works Inc - Main Office Merrimack, NH F 2.6
Mukilteo Water & Wastewater District Mukilteo, WA F 2.5
Gene Pump Plant Parker Dam, CA F 2.5
New Castle Operation New Castle, PA F 2.5
Aqua Pennsylvania Bryn Mawr, PA F 2.5
Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County Murfreesboro, TN F 2.5
New Jersey American Water - Shrewsbury Field Ops Shrewsbury, NJ F 2.5
A/R Enviromental Technologies Cayey, PR F 2.5
Water/Sewer Maintenance Asheboro, NC F 2.5
DWM-Jardine Water Purification Plant JWPP | 1000 E. Ohio St. Chicago, IL F 2.5
Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. - Phoenixville Phoenixville, PA F 2.4
City of Pompano Beach Pompano Beach, FL F 2.4
Water and Wastewater Utility Georgetown, KY D 2.4
Las Vegas Valley Water District Las Vegas, NV D 2.4
Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority Randleman, NC D 2.4
UTY - New Jersey - Hackensack,NJ Hackensack, NJ D 2.4
Water/Wastewater Department Morganton, NC D 2.4
ILAWC Champaign Urbana, IL D 2.4
Aqua Virginia, Inc. - Rockville Rockville, VA D 2.3
Jordanelle Water Reclamation Facility Heber City, UT D 2.3
F&V Operations and Resource Management, Inc. Grand Rapids, MI D 2.3
Velocity Constructors Inc Englewood, CO D 2.3
Champlain Water District South Burlington, VT D 2.3
Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) San Antonio, TX D 2.3
Inland Empire Utilites Agency Chino, CA D 2.3
Main Office Canyon Lake, TX D 2.3
DWM-Sawyer Water Purification Plant SWPP | 3300 E. Cheltenham Place Chicago, IL D 2.3
Iowa American Water Davenport, IA D 2.3
6271-020 Ontario, CA D 2.3
Kanawha Valley Operations Center Charleston, WV D 2.2
Hoboken - OMI Hoboken, NJ D 2.2
Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility Detroit, MI D 2.2
East Tennessee Mechanical Contractors Knoxville, TN D 2.2
Granger-Hunter Improvement District West Valley City, UT D 2.2
Culligan Newburgh, NY D 2.2
Sierra Vista Sierra Vista, AZ D 2.2
Louisville Water Company Louisville, KY D 2.2
6271-035 Rancho Cordova, CA D 2.2
Aulick Chemical Solutions Nicholasville, KY D 2.2
Apache Junction Apache Junction, AZ D 2.2
Public Works Franklin, NC D 2.1
City of Harrisonburg Public Utilities (Operations) Harrisonburg, VA D 2.1
Gene Pumping Plant Parker Dam, CA D 2.1
← Prev Page 11 of 17 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Water supply systems?

This sector averages 5.2 against a BLS benchmark of 1.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.