Industry profile · NAICS 221310

Water supply systems

Workplace injury rates across 836 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

836
Employers
5.2
Avg TCR
1.2
BLS benchmark
13,051
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Water supply systems average 5.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 4.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 1.2.

5.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
1.2
BLS national benchmark
836
employers reporting
13,051
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Water supply systems Safety Data Reveals

The Water supply systems sector (NAICS 221310) encompasses 836 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 13,051 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 1.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.2 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Water supply systems that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 5 of 17
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Holley Navarre Water System Navarre, FL F 6.6
Public Utility District #1 of Kitsap County Poulsbo, WA F 6.6
Waterloo Water Works Waterloo, IA F 6.6
Water pollution control authority Stamford, CT F 6.6
Fresno Irrigation District Fresno, CA F 6.5
Mountain Water District Pikeville, KY F 6.5
Southern Utilities Tyler, TX F 6.5
Water Resources H310 Mesa, AZ F 6.5
American Water Operations and Maintenance, LLC Camden, NJ F 6.5
New Jersey American Water-Fire Road Egg Harbor Township, NJ F 6.5
Lake Hemet Municipal Water District Hemet, CA F 6.5
Springfield Water and Sewer Commission Agawam, MA F 6.5
6271-041 Gardena, CA F 6.5
CHWD Citrus Heights, CA F 6.5
West Haven Waste Water Treatment West Haven, CT F 6.4
Wheaton Sanitary District Wheaton, IL F 6.4
Water Lake Plant West Olive, MI F 6.4
City of Albany-Public Works Operations/WRF Albany, OR F 6.4
Moss Point MS Moss Point, MS F 6.4
Vista Irrigation District Vista, CA F 6.3
Repairs Conway, SC F 6.3
Suburban Water Systems - SJH West Covina, CA F 6.3
Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. - Willow Grove Willow Grove, PA F 6.3
Fontana Water Company Fontana, CA F 6.3
Autoridad de Acueductos y Alcantarillados de Puerto Rico San Juan, PR F 6.3
Westchester New Rochelle, NY F 6.3
D.A. Wood Construction, Inc. Modesto, CA F 6.3
Valparaiso City Services Valparaiso, IN F 6.3
LASAN - Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant Playa Del Rey, CA F 6.3
Louisiana Water Company Baton Rouge, LA F 6.3
Great Basin Water Company - Pahrump Pahrump, NV F 6.2
City of Raleigh- Public Utilities Raleigh, NC F 6.2
Water Equipment Technologies Longwood, FL F 6.2
Berkeley County Water & Sanitation Moncks Corner, SC F 6.2
Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority Albuquerque, NM F 6.2
Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. - West Chester West Chester, PA F 6.1
Water Treatment Facility Wilson Mills, NC F 6.1
Yolo County Flood Control & WCD Woodland, CA F 6.1
Village of Arlington Heights - Public Works - Water Department Arlington Heights, IL F 6.1
County of Stafford Stafford, VA F 6.1
Rowland Water District Rowland Heights, CA F 6.1
Patoka Lake Regional Water & Sewer District Dubois, IN F 6.1
Reclamation District No. 108 Knights Landing, CA F 6.0
Aqueous Vets Jacksonville Jacksonville, FL F 6.0
Cucamonga Valley Water District Rancho Cucamonga, CA F 6.0
Water Treatment City of Wyoming Wyoming, MI F 6.0
Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District Beaumont, CA F 6.0
Artesian Wastewater Management, Inc. Milton, DE F 6.0
Water Treatment Plant Eden Prairie, MN F 6.0
Hardin County Water District No. 2 Elizabethtown, KY F 6.0
← Prev Page 5 of 17 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Water supply systems?

This sector averages 5.2 against a BLS benchmark of 1.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.