Industry profile · NAICS 221310

Water supply systems

Workplace injury rates across 836 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

836
Employers
5.2
Avg TCR
1.2
BLS benchmark
13,051
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Water supply systems average 5.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 4.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 1.2.

5.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
1.2
BLS national benchmark
836
employers reporting
13,051
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Water supply systems Safety Data Reveals

The Water supply systems sector (NAICS 221310) encompasses 836 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 13,051 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 1.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.2 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Water supply systems that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 6 of 17
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Fallbrook PUD Fallbrook, CA F 5.9
Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. - Sharon Sharon, PA F 5.9
A.C. Schultes of Carolina, INC Rocky Point, NC F 5.9
EDP Houston, TX F 5.9
Marshalltown Water Works Marshalltown, IA F 5.9
System Operations Center Henderson, KY F 5.8
Rend Lake Conservancy District Benton, IL F 5.8
00000012 Water Santa Cruz, CA F 5.8
Sldmwa Tfo Byron, CA F 5.8
DuPage Water Commission Elmhurst, IL F 5.8
Wrenshall City Hall Wrenshall, MN F 5.8
DWM-Central District - 39th and Ashland | 3901 S. Ashland Chicago, IL F 5.7
Solano Irrigation District Vacaville, CA F 5.7
San Dieguito Water District Encinitas, CA F 5.7
Central California Irigation District Los Banos, CA F 5.7
Diamond Valley Lake Hemet, CA F 5.7
Operations_Brookside_Equipment Services Vancouver, WA F 5.7
Jurupa Community Services District Jurupa Valley, CA F 5.6
Alta Irrigation District Dinuba, CA F 5.6
Franklin TN Franklin, TN F 5.6
Aqua Illinois, Inc. - Kankakee Kankakee, IL F 5.6
Iron Mountain Pumping Plant Earp, CA F 5.6
DWM-South District-1040 W. 95th Street | 1040 W. 95th St. Chicago, IL F 5.6
Water Division Indianapolis, IN F 5.6
Glasgow Water Company Glasgow, KY F 5.6
Rancho California Water District Temecula, CA F 5.6
James Irrigation District San Joaquin, CA F 5.5
Aqua Water Supply Corporation Bastrop, TX F 5.5
West Central Conservancy District Avon, IN F 5.5
El Monte Headquarters El Monte, CA F 5.5
Robert Skinner Filtration Plant Winchester, CA F 5.4
DWM-39th and Iron Central Dispatch New Construction | 1424 W. Pershing Rd. Chicago, IL F 5.4
Moulton Niguel Water District Laguna Niguel, CA F 5.4
Brunswick Regional Water & Sewer H2GO Leland, NC F 5.3
Consolidated Irrigation District Selma, CA F 5.3
Culligan Water Salt Lake City, UT F 5.3
Operations Jacksonville, NC F 5.3
NJ Hackensack (UT) Hackensack, NJ F 5.3
Aqua Ohio, Inc. - Westerville Westerville, OH F 5.3
Pawtucket Pawtucket, RI F 5.3
WVWA Crystal Spring Roanoke, VA F 5.3
Montecito Water District Santa Barbara, CA F 5.3
Public Utility District No. 1 of Thurston County Lacey, WA F 5.3
East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water Oakland, CA F 5.3
Aqua Ohio, Inc. - Mentor Mentor, OH F 5.3
Pittsburgh Operations Bethel Park, PA F 5.2
LA Water Service/UI of LA Covington Office Covington, LA F 5.2
Georgetown County Water and Sewer District Georgetown, SC F 5.2
District Office Carmichael, CA F 5.2
Robert Diemer Filtration Plant Yorba Linda, CA F 5.2
← Prev Page 6 of 17 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Water supply systems?

This sector averages 5.2 against a BLS benchmark of 1.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.