Nature parks · Washington

Seattle Parks and Recreation

Seattle, WA · ~1,589 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Seattle Parks and Recreation runs at 367% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nature parks workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.1
industry benchmark (BLS)
414
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Seattle Parks and Recreation's OSHA Total Case Rate of 11.4 to the Nature parks BLS benchmark of 3.1 (367% of benchmark) across 4 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Seattle Parks and Recreation's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.1 industry benchmark.

051015 2019202220232024 8.63.1 Industry benchmarkSeattle Parks and Recreation TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 712190.

Where Seattle Parks and Recreation falls in its industry

140 Nature parks establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Trend analysis for Seattle Parks and Recreation

Between 2019 and 2024, Seattle Parks and Recreation's Total Case Rate improved from 13.8 to 8.6 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 38% decrease across 5 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2024, at a TCR of 8.6, while 2019 saw the highest rate, at 13.8, a spread of 5.2 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 4 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.

Summed across those 4 reporting years, Seattle Parks and Recreation recorded 414 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 4-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 414 injuries, 37 illnesses shown on this page for Seattle Parks and Recreation are sourced from its own 4 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 712190 - Nature parks.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

88 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 2,602,672 hours worked = 6.76 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Seattle Parks and Recreation (this establishment) 11.38 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 4-year avg
Conservation areas industry avg 3.10 BLS IIF, NAICS 712190
Washington state avg (all industries) 6.20 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Seattle Parks and Recreation to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.6 6.8 104 8 0
2023 9.4 6.3 97 2 0
2022 13.8 7.9 91 17 0
2019 13.8 9.1 122 10 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Seattle Parks and Recreation's reported OSHA injury record versus its Nature parks peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 367% of the Nature parks benchmark, Seattle Parks and Recreation reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Nature parks sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Seattle Parks and Recreation's safety grade?
Seattle Parks and Recreation has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 11.4 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.1 for Nature parks.
How many injuries has Seattle Parks and Recreation reported?
Seattle Parks and Recreation has reported 414 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 4 years of OSHA data (2024, 2023, 2022, 2019). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Washington, and by nearby establishments in Seattle - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.