Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing · Florida

Space and Airborne Systems : FL, Melbourne - 100 Rialto Place (SAS-Other)

Melbourne, FL · ~100 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Space and Airborne Systems : FL, Melbourne - 100 Rialto Place (SAS-Other) runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.3
industry benchmark (BLS)
0
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Space and Airborne Systems : FL, Melbourne - 100 Rialto Place (SAS-Other)'s OSHA Total Case Rate of 0.0 to the Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (0% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Where Space and Airborne Systems : FL, Melbourne - 100 Rialto Place (SAS-Other) falls in its industry

472 Search, Detection, Navigation, establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 46 Search, Detection, Navigation, employers in Florida.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 0 injuries shown on this page for Space and Airborne Systems : FL, Melbourne - 100 Rialto Place (SAS-Other) are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 334511 - Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2020)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 194,294 hours worked = 0.00 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Space and Airborne Systems : FL, Melbourne - 100 Rialto Place (SAS-Other) (this establishment) 0.00 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 334511
Florida state avg (all industries) 4.57 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Space and Airborne Systems : FL, Melbourne - 100 Rialto Place (SAS-Other) to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 - - 0 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Space and Airborne Systems : FL, Melbourne - 100 Rialto Place (SAS-Other)'s reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.

  • At 0% of the Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing benchmark, Space and Airborne Systems : FL, Melbourne - 100 Rialto Place (SAS-Other) reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Space and Airborne Systems : FL, Melbourne - 100 Rialto Place (SAS-Other)'s safety grade?
Space and Airborne Systems : FL, Melbourne - 100 Rialto Place (SAS-Other) has a safety grade of C (Average Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 0.0 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing.
How many injuries has Space and Airborne Systems : FL, Melbourne - 100 Rialto Place (SAS-Other) reported?
Space and Airborne Systems : FL, Melbourne - 100 Rialto Place (SAS-Other) has reported 0 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2020, 2019). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Florida, and by nearby establishments in Melbourne - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Similar TCR (~0.0)

Similar size (~100 workers)

Nearby in Melbourne

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.