Industry profile · NAICS 334516

Automatic chemical analyzers, laboratory-type, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 264 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

264
Employers
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
2,216
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Automatic chemical analyzers, laboratory-type, manufacturing average 1.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

1.8
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
264
employers reporting
2,216
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Automatic chemical analyzers, laboratory-type, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Automatic chemical analyzers, laboratory-type, manufacturing sector (NAICS 334516) encompasses 264 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,216 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.8 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Automatic chemical analyzers, laboratory-type, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 5 of 6
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
PKI Boston Boston, MA A 0.3
2967-WI107 Madison, WI A 0.3
Dallas-ADD Irving, TX A 0.3
2967-AZ159 Chandler, AZ A 0.3
NC737 Burlington, NC A 0.3
Life Sciences : Beckman Coulter - Loveland Loveland, CO A 0.3
Thermo Electron Scientific Instruments, LLC Madison, WI A 0.2
Life Sciences: Beckman Coulter (Labcyte) - San Jose San Jose, CA A 0.2
Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin Austin, TX A 0.2
Edgewater/Norwood Norwood, MA A 0.2
FEI - Thermo Fisher Hillsboro, OR A 0.2
Thermo Fisher PAI Tewksbury, MA A 0.1
Bruker Nano Surfaces - Madison Madison, WI A 0.1
Tucker-Davis Technologies, Inc. Alachua, FL C 0.0
MKS Logan North Logan, UT C 0.0
InDevR Boulder, CO C 0.0
Petroleum Analyzer Company, L.P. Houston, TX C 0.0
MOBILion Systems Chadds Ford, PA C 0.0
Teledyne Hanson Research Chatsworth, CA C 0.0
General Monitors, Inc Corona, CA C 0.0
Princeton Instruments - Acton Acton, MA C 0.0
Redwood City, CA Redwood City, CA C 0.0
Mettler Toledo Rainin, LLC - Warehouse Vacaville, CA C 0.0
Teledyne FLIR West Lafayette West Lafayette, IN C 0.0
HORIBA Instruments Incorporated - Irvine Scientific Irvine, CA C 0.0
Nanovea Inc. Irvine, CA C 0.0
Beckman Coulter - Indianapolis (RD) Indianapolis, IN C 0.0
Waters Corporation/Wyatt Goleta, CA C 0.0
Ma169 Spectro Scientific Chelmsford, MA C 0.0
Ma210 Spectro Wilmington, MA C 0.0
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. - Florida Region Tampa, FL C 0.0
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. - North Atlantic Region Marlborough, MA C 0.0
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. - North California Region Pleasanton, CA C 0.0
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. - New Jersey Region Somerset, NJ C 0.0
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. - Southern California Region Carlsbad, CA C 0.0
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. - South Central Region Missouri City, TX C 0.0
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. - South Eastern Region Durham, NC C 0.0
Honeywell Analytics Lincolnshire, IL C 0.0
AJA International, Inc. Hingham, MA C 0.0
World Precision Instruments, LLC Sarasota, FL C 0.0
Wi107 Cameca Instruments, Inc. Madison, WI C 0.0
Az159 Brookfield - Azi Chandler, AZ C 0.0
Cole Parmer Webster, TX C 0.0
Anton Paar QuantaTec Inc. Boynton Beach, FL C 0.0
Gow-Mac Instrument Co. Bethlehem, PA C 0.0
Advion Inc. Ithaca, NY C 0.0
ISS, Inc. Champaign, IL C 0.0
Sigma-Aldrich RTC Laramie, WY C 0.0
MSP - a Division of TSI Shoreview, MN C 0.0
Honeywell Industrial Safety - Lincolnshire IL (IL59) Lincolnshire, IL C 0.0
← Prev Page 5 of 6 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Automatic chemical analyzers, laboratory-type, manufacturing?

This sector averages 1.8 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.