Industry profile · NAICS 335911

Batteries, rechargeable, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 175 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

175
Employers
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
5,576
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Batteries, rechargeable, manufacturing average 3.0 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

3.0
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
175
employers reporting
5,576
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Batteries, rechargeable, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Batteries, rechargeable, manufacturing sector (NAICS 335911) encompasses 175 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 5,576 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.0 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.0 is below the BLS benchmark — a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers — not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Batteries, rechargeable, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
EnerSys Menomonee Falls MENOMONEE FALLS, WI C 3.3
EnerSys Quallion LLC SYLMAR, CA C 3.3
LGCMI HOLLAND, MI C 3.3
LGVU TROY, MI C 3.3
LG Energy Solutions - Hazel Park HAZEL PARK, MI C 3.2
EnerSys Somerset SOMERSET, NJ C 3.2
Trojan Battery Company Lithonia LITHONIA, GA C 3.1
Enersys WARRENSBURG, MO C 3.1
St. Joseph MO DC ST. JOSEPH, MO C 2.9
LG Energy Solutions - Holland HOLLAND, MI C 2.9
MC Ionic Solutions US Inc. MEMPHIS, TN C 2.8
H&T Nevada, LLC SPARKS, NV C 2.8
Crown Battery Manufacturing Company - Fremont Manufacturing Location FREMONT, OH C 2.8
Enersys - Battery Plant RICHMOND, KY C 2.8
Battery Plant - Smyrna SMYRNA, TN C 2.7
EnerSys Carrollton CARROLLTON, TX C 2.7
Redwood Materials CARSON CITY, NV C 2.7
San Antonio Distribution Center SAN ANTONIO, TX B 2.6
Concentric Critical Power CARROLLTON, TX B 2.6
Inspired Energy LLC NEWBERRY, FL B 2.6
Industrial Battery Engineering, Inc. SUN VALLEY, CA B 2.5
XALT Energy, LLC MIDLAND, MI B 2.4
Exide Technologies DC KANSAS CITY, KS B 2.3
Us Battery Evans EVANS, GA B 2.3
Exide Technologies SALINA, KS B 2.3
EnerSys Norcross NORCROSS, GA B 2.3
Lithion Battery HENDERSON, NV B 2.3
EnerSys National Parts Center/Distribution Center RICHMOND, KY B 2.2
Toledo OH HOLLAND, OH B 2.2
EnerSys Wyoming WYOMING, MI B 2.1
Stryten Manchester LLC MANCHESTER, IA B 2.1
Dragonfly Energy RENO, NV B 2.1
St. Joseph MO DAP ST. JOSEPH, MO B 2.1
SK Battery America, Inc COMMERCE, GA B 2.1
Imperium3 New York, Inc ENDICOTT, NY B 2.0
Reaco Battery Service Corporation JOHNSTON CITY, IL B 1.9
Mathews Associates Inc SANFORD, FL B 1.9
Preco, Inc. -KS LENEXA, KS B 1.9
Industrial Power Source SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA, CA B 1.8
EaglePicher Technologies-East Greenwich EAST GREENWICH, RI B 1.8
Eos Energy TURTLE CREEK, PA B 1.8
XALT Energy-Midland MIDLAND, MI B 1.7
St. Joseph DAP ST JOSEPH, MO B 1.7
Exide Technologies-Fort Smith FORT SMITH, AR B 1.7
Solid Energy Systems LLC WOBURN, MA A 1.6
Concentric Power GREENSBORO, NC A 1.6
Burlingame Location BURLINGAME, CA A 1.6
Florence KY FLORENCE, KY A 1.6
XALT Energy Midland MIDLAND, MI A 1.5
EaglePicher Technologies SOUTHBRIDGE, MA A 1.4
← Prev Page 2 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Batteries, rechargeable, manufacturing?

This sector averages 3.0 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 — but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.