Industry profile · NAICS 333922

Belt conveyor systems manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 411 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

411
Employers
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
6,022
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Belt conveyor systems manufacturing average 4.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

4.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
411
employers reporting
6,022
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Belt conveyor systems manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Belt conveyor systems manufacturing sector (NAICS 333922) encompasses 411 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 6,022 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Belt conveyor systems manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 9
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Rapat Corporation Hawley, MN D 5.3
DCL Charlevoix Charlevoix, MI D 5.3
California Vibratory Feeders Anaheim, CA D 5.3
Alliance Machine Systems International LLC Spokane Valley, WA D 5.3
Hutchinson-Mayrath Clay Center Clay Center, KS D 5.2
Superior Industries - SW Prescott Valley, AZ D 5.2
Superior Industries- Columbus Columbus, NE D 5.2
Heinzen LLC Gilroy, CA D 5.2
sidneymfg Sidney, OH D 5.2
Algonac Algonac, MI D 5.2
OPEX Corp. Site 2 Pennsauken, NJ D 5.2
R+D Custom Automation Lake Villa, IL D 5.1
Mk North America, Inc. Bloomfield, CT D 5.1
Stewart Glapat Corporation Zanesville, OH D 5.0
Reacher Mfg. Corp. Alpena, MI D 5.0
Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division Morris, MN D 4.9
Santa Rosa Systems Mount Washington, KY D 4.9
Pdp LLC Chattanooga, TN D 4.9
Ambaflex Manufacturing Inc. Canton, OH D 4.8
C&M Conveyor Inc. Mitchell, IN D 4.8
Modula Lewiston Lewiston, ME D 4.8
Appleton Marine Inc Appleton, WI D 4.8
PRAB Inc Kalamazoo, MI D 4.8
JM Conveyors PA Blairsville, PA D 4.8
Conveyor Systems, Inc. Alpena, MI D 4.8
Superior Industries, Inc. - 109 Division Loganville, GA D 4.8
Hytrol Conveyor Company Jonesboro, AR D 4.8
SEN-PACK Deland, FL D 4.7
Bastian Automation Engineering Greenfield, IN D 4.7
HoneywellOH01 London, OH D 4.7
Martin Sprocket & Gear 31 Albemarle, NC D 4.6
Custom Metal Designs, Inc Oakland, FL D 4.6
Ralphs-Pugh Co. Benicia, CA D 4.6
Martin Sprocket & Gear 33 Ft Worth, TX D 4.6
Carman Industries Jeffersonville, IN D 4.6
Schenck Process Whitewater, WI D 4.6
Fenner Dunlop Americas - Northern Appalachian Homer City, PA D 4.5
CP Manufacturing San Diego, CA D 4.5
Midwest Automation and Custom Fabrication, Inc. Fort Smith, AR D 4.5
Frost, Inc. Grand Rapids, MI D 4.5
Fenner Dunlop Americas - Northern Appalachia Homer City, PA D 4.4
Industrial Kinetics Downers Grove, IL D 4.4
Bastian Custom Automation Greenfield, IN D 4.3
FI Green Bay, WI D 4.3
UMD Automated Systems, Inc. Fredericktown, OH D 4.3
Quickdraft, Inc. Canton, OH D 4.2
Continental Global Material Handling LLC Winfield Winfield, AL D 4.2
JM Conveyors Lebanon, VA D 4.2
Feeco International Inc Green Bay, WI D 4.1
Advanced Manufacturing Technology for Bottles, Inc. Loveland, CO D 4.1
← Prev Page 3 of 9 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Belt conveyor systems manufacturing?

This sector averages 4.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.