Industry profile · NAICS 623311

Continuing care retirement communities

Workplace injury rates across 4,269 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

4,269
Employers
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
BLS benchmark
81,354
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Continuing care retirement communities average 8.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.2 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.8.

8.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.8
BLS national benchmark
4,269
employers reporting
81,354
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Continuing care retirement communities Safety Data Reveals

The Continuing care retirement communities sector (NAICS 623311) encompasses 4,269 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 81,354 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 8.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 8.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Continuing care retirement communities that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 76 of 87
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Oak Terrace Senior Housing of Gaylord Gaylord, Mn, MN B 2.4
The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Clinton Clinton, TN B 2.4
Elm York Home for Adults East Elmhurst, NY B 2.4
Wa366 Heritage House at the Market-Seattle Hr Seattle, WA B 2.4
Mercy Ridge, Inc Timonium, MD B 2.4
Parker Place Parkersburg, IA B 2.4
The Opal at Naples LLC Naples, FL B 2.4
Lakeview Commons Maplewood, MN B 2.4
Eastmont Lincoln, NE B 2.3
Parks Place Memory Care Plymouth, MN B 2.3
The Inn at University Village Massillon, OH B 2.3
Lakewood Memory Care Lakewood, CO B 2.3
ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Lima Estates Media, PA B 2.3
Plateau Healthcare Brooklyn Park, MN B 2.3
Friends Homes at Guilford Grensboro, NC B 2.3
Brookdale North Chandler Chandler, AZ B 2.3
Pioneer Ridge Mckinney, TX B 2.3
Senior Citizens Home, Inc. Henderson, NC B 2.3
Hunters Crossing Place M C Gainesville, FL B 2.3
Brookdale East Niskayuna Niskayuna, NY B 2.3
Rocky River Rocky River, OH B 2.3
The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living Foley, MN B 2.3
The Oaks at Bartlett Bartlett, IL B 2.3
Lynn's Heritage House, Inc Louisiana, MO B 2.3
Olympus Ranch Murray, UT B 2.3
Magnolia Place Rogers, AR B 2.3
McKenna Crossing Prior Lake, MN B 2.3
Arden Courts of Chagrin Falls Chagrin Falls, OH B 2.3
Everlan of Johnson City Johnson City, TN B 2.3
Dekalb Area Retirement Center Dekalb, IL B 2.2
Laurelhurst/Laurelwoods Columbus, NC B 2.2
R V Properties LLC Cuyahoga Falls, OH B 2.2
Brookdale Stonestreet Louisville, KY B 2.2
Russellville Park Portland, OR B 2.2
Cplace Zachary ALF, LLC Zachary, LA B 2.2
Palms at La Quinta La Quinta, CA B 2.2
Sandy Springs Place P C Atlanta, GA B 2.2
Cornerstone Residence of Kelliher Kelliher, MN B 2.2
Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA B 2.2
Baptist Memorials Ministries San Angelo, TX B 2.2
Camino Real Senior Living San Antonio, TX B 2.2
Prairie Ridge of Galena Galena, IL B 2.2
Kenosha County Kenosha, WI B 2.2
Wellington at North Richland Hills North Richland Hills, TX B 2.2
Waterford at Huebner San Antonio, TX B 2.2
Peachtree Village Retirement Community Roswell, NM B 2.2
Mansfield Place Mansfield, OH B 2.2
Maison Jardin Morgan City, LA B 2.2
Avon Senior Living, LLC dba Rose Senior Living Avon Avon, OH B 2.2
American House - Lakeshore St Clair Shores, MI B 2.2
← Prev Page 76 of 87 Next →

Safety grades are a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA and BLS data, not an official OSHA rating. Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Related

All industries → | Rankings →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Continuing care retirement communities?

This sector averages 8.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.