Industry profile · NAICS 333995

Hydraulic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 153 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

153
Employers
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
2,347
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Hydraulic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing average 3.4 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.0 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

3.4
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
153
employers reporting
2,347
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Hydraulic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Hydraulic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing sector (NAICS 333995) encompasses 153 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,347 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.4 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.4 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Hydraulic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Jarp Reman Wausau, WI C 3.3
American Cylinder Corporate Peotone, IL C 3.3
Tolomatic, Inc. Hamel, MN C 3.2
HYCO Alabama, LLC Arab, AL C 3.2
Custom Hoists Ashland, OH C 3.2
Hydromotion Spring City, PA C 3.2
PHD, Inc. Fort Wayne Fort Wayne, IN C 3.1
Venture Mfg Co Dayton, OH C 3.1
Yates Industries South Decatur, AL C 3.1
Prince Manufacturing Corporation-Brookings Brookings, SD C 3.0
Jarp Industries Schofield, WI C 3.0
General Engineering Company Plant 2 Glade Spring, VA C 3.0
R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. New Philadelphia, OH C 3.0
Milwaukee Cylinder - Cudahy Cudahy, WI C 3.0
Hmc P-2 Bay Springs, MS C 3.0
A T Controls, Inc. - Ohio Cincinnati, OH C 2.9
Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 2 Bay Springs, MS C 2.8
Taylor N. Tonawanda, NY B 2.6
Innovative Rescue Systems Valparaiso, IN B 2.6
Moog, Inc. - Orrville Orrville, OH B 2.5
PHD, Inc. Huntington Huntington, IN B 2.5
SMC Corporation of America Noblesville, IN B 2.4
IMI Precision Engineering Machesney Park, IL B 2.4
Bimba Manufacturing Company University Park, IL B 2.2
Motion Systems : Ashley Ashley, IN B 2.2
TRD Manufacturing Inc Machesney Park, IL B 2.2
Jackson Hyd Mi Jackson, MI B 2.1
Cylinder Manufacturing Valve & Pump Plant Hays, KS B 2.1
R&M Fluid Power, Inc. Youngstown, OH B 2.1
Denver Branch Englewood, CO B 2.0
Taylor Devices Inc. North Tonawanda, NY B 2.0
Danfoss Power Solutions II Jackson, MI B 1.8
Carlson Hydraulics, LLC Wichita, KS B 1.8
Motion Systems : Enumclaw Enumclaw, WA B 1.8
Main Office Elk Grove Village, IL B 1.7
Texas Hydraulics Inc Temple, TX B 1.7
Fabco-Air, Inc. Gainesville, FL B 1.7
B & B Hydraulics, Inc Hutchinson, KS B 1.7
Motion Systems : Benton Benton, AR B 1.7
Prince Manufacturing Corporation-Yankton Yankton, SD B 1.7
Motion Systems : Plymouth Plymouth, MI B 1.7
DADCO, Inc. Plymouth, MI A 1.6
Houston Corporate Campus Houston, TX A 1.6
B&H Machine Inc. Mineva, OH A 1.6
Bailey Manufacturing, LLC Knoxville, TN A 1.6
Ace Controls, Inc. Farmington Hills, MI A 1.6
MFP Automation Engineering Hudsonville, MI A 1.4
Cross Manufacturing Inc. Overland Park, KS A 1.3
Danfoss Freeport, IL A 1.3
Morgan Manufacturing Inc Hot Springs, AR A 1.3
← Prev Page 2 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Hydraulic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing?

This sector averages 3.4 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.