Industry profile · NAICS 334519

Meteorological instruments manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 164 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

164
Employers
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
768
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Meteorological instruments manufacturing average 1.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

1.8
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
164
employers reporting
768
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Meteorological instruments manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Meteorological instruments manufacturing sector (NAICS 334519) encompasses 164 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 768 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.8 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Meteorological instruments manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Sun Nuclear Corporation Melbourne, FL A 0.7
Ams, Hq Littleton, CO A 0.7
Stellar Technology Inc. Amherst, NY A 0.6
Headquarter San Diego, CA A 0.6
eVproducts Zelienople, PA A 0.6
Far West Technology, Inc. Goleta, CA A 0.6
GE Inspection Technologies, LP Skaneateles, NY A 0.6
Digital Solutions : IT - Skaneateles, NY Skaneateles, NY A 0.6
Zetec Snoqualmie, WA A 0.6
Olympus Kennewick Kennewick, WA A 0.5
Reuter-Stokes Twinsburg, OH A 0.5
2967-TN82 Oak Ridge, TN A 0.5
Draeger, Inc. - Houston Houston, TX A 0.5
Enmet LLC Ann Arbor, MI A 0.5
Diversified Technical Systems Inc Seal Beach, CA A 0.5
Michigan Scientific Corporation Charlevoix, MI A 0.5
Dynamic Systems INC Poestenkill, NY A 0.4
Thermo Fisher Scientific Oakwood, OH A 0.4
John Deere Waterloo Works Product Engineering Center Cedar Falls, IA A 0.3
Main Facility Butler, PA A 0.3
Bethel Ct Bethel, CT A 0.3
A&D Technology Inc Ann Arbor, MI A 0.3
Tn82 Instrument Mfg Oak Ridge, TN A 0.3
Baron Services, Inc. Huntsville, AL A 0.3
Sun Nuclear - Florida Melbourne, FL A 0.2
Saint-Gobain Crystals- Hiram Hiram, OH A 0.2
Mirion Technologies (Canberra), Inc. Meriden, CT A 0.2
Digital Solutions : MC - North America Distributed Minden, NV A 0.1
Titan Industries Spring, TX C 0.0
Q-Lab Corporation Florida Homestead, FL C 0.0
MB Dynamics, Inc Bedford Hts, OH C 0.0
Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie Minneapolis, MN C 0.0
GCTS Tempe, AZ C 0.0
AS&E - Rad Detection Oak Ridge, TN C 0.0
Michigan Scientific Corporation Milford, MI C 0.0
DeFelsko Defelsko 800 Proctor Ave Ogdensburg, Ny, NY C 0.0
Poseidon Systems, LLC Victor, NY C 0.0
Ronan Engineering Florence, KY C 0.0
Schenck USA Corp. - Southfield Southfield, MI C 0.0
26-144583160-2 Novi, MI C 0.0
Teledyne FLIR Oak Ridge Oak Ridge, TN C 0.0
Ma143 Amptek Bedford, MA C 0.0
SonTek a Xylem Brand San Diego, CA C 0.0
Future Technologies, Inc. Bay City, MI C 0.0
Teledyne Detcon Cypress, TX C 0.0
OFI Testing Equipment, Inc. Houston, TX C 0.0
Aerofab NDT LLC Kent, WA C 0.0
DeFelsko Corp. Ogdensburg, NY C 0.0
PI - Auburn Auburn, MA C 0.0
R.M. Young Company Traverse City, MI C 0.0
← Prev Page 3 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Meteorological instruments manufacturing?

This sector averages 1.8 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.