Industry profile · NAICS 333242

Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 152 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

152
Employers
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
1,332
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing average 1.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

1.8
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
152
employers reporting
1,332
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing sector (NAICS 333242) encompasses 152 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 1,332 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.8 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
USFSO Santa Clara, CA A 0.5
Air Liquide Electronics Advanced Equipment Systems Chanhassen, MN A 0.5
Spt Microtechnologies San Jose, CA A 0.5
Austin TEA Austin, TX A 0.5
Brooks Automation, Inc. - Chelmsford Chelmsford, MA A 0.5
ASML Wilton, CT A 0.5
Lam Research Corp Fishkill Field Office Fishkill, NY A 0.5
Lam Research Corp. Livermore Campus Livermore, CA A 0.5
Daifuku Cleanroom Automation America Corporation AZ Chandler, AZ A 0.4
CAAKT Campus Santa Clara,, CA A 0.4
Qrs Center Hillsboro, OR A 0.4
TEL FSI, Inc. Chaska, MN A 0.4
7130 Columbia Columbia, MD A 0.4
Kinetic Systems Inc. Mega Fluid Tualatin, OR A 0.4
Lam Research Corp. Austin Field Office Austin, TX A 0.4
TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America Chaska, MN A 0.4
Arques Campus, Applied Materials, (Bldg. 72,81, 85,87) Sunnyvale,, CA A 0.4
CAARQUES Campus Sunnyvale, CA A 0.4
Tel Us Hq Austin, TX A 0.4
Lam Research Corp. Fremont Campus Fremont, CA A 0.3
Brooks Automation Inc. - Fremont Fremont, CA A 0.3
Brooks Automation. Inc South Plainfield, NJ A 0.3
CAAKT Campus, Applied Materials, (Bldg. 91,92, 93, 21) Santa Clara, CA A 0.3
Albany TEA Albany, NY A 0.3
Boise Tea Boise, ID A 0.2
TTCA Albany, NY A 0.2
HQ Methuen Methuen, MA A 0.2
Bowers Campus, (Bldgs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12) Santa Clara, CA A 0.2
CABOWERS Campus Santa Clara, CA A 0.2
TXAU41, Bldg. 41, Applied Materials Austin, TX A 0.1
San Jose Building 59 San Jose, TX A 0.1
TXAU41 Austin, TX A 0.1
Lam Research Fremont Fremont, CA A 0.1
Lam Research Corp. Austin TX-11 Site Austin, TX C 0.0
Lam Research Corp Field Office Waltham, MA C 0.0
Thermo Fisher Scientific Richardson Richardson, TX C 0.0
Draper 16th Street St. Petersburg, FL C 0.0
Von Ardenne North America Perrysburg, OH C 0.0
Canon Nanotechnologies, Inc Austin, TX C 0.0
Angstrom Sciences Inc. Duquesne, PA C 0.0
Dutek, Inc. Vista, CA C 0.0
Microchip Technology Inc. Bend, OR C 0.0
NxEdge, Inc. (Mossy Cup Boise, ID C 0.0
AceCo Precision Mfg. (S. TK Ave.) Boise, ID C 0.0
Hine Automation, LLC Saint Petersburg, FL C 0.0
RAJE Technology Group LLC Saint Petersburg, FL C 0.0
Lam Research Corp Meridian Field Office Meridian, ID C 0.0
Advanced Equipment Systems Chanhassen, MN C 0.0
AJA International, Inc. Scituate, MA C 0.0
ORDUR01 - Durham - Applied Materials Durham, OR C 0.0
← Prev Page 3 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing?

This sector averages 1.8 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.