Wafer processing equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing · Minnesota

TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America

Chaska, MN · ~122 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Wafer processing equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Wafer processing equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America safety composite

TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America: 0.0 → 0.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 0.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.8 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333242 · Chaska, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO 7130 Columbia
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 7130 Columbia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Wafer processing equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America falls in its industry

133 Wafer processing equipment, se establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Wafer processing equipment, se employers in Minnesota.

TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America (122 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America
TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America (122 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 1.2

TEL Manufacturing and Engineering of America has more employees than the Wafer processing equipment, semiconducto median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333242 · MN · Chaska

133 Wafer processing equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 87 employers in Chaska, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 7130 Columbia 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kinetic Systems Inc. Mega Fluid 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lam Research Corp. Austin Field Office 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arques Campus, Applied Materials, (Bldg. 72,81, 85,87) 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Doran Companies LLc. 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE FHR Pine Bend 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zintl, Inc. 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foodservice Northland Cheese - 1036 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska 917 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake Region Medical 830 FTE
CITY-NEAR Entegris - Chaska 731 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administration 596 FTE
NAT-TCR Gray Construction - Lexington 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR DeltaHawk Engines, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Alliant Techsystems Operations, LLC, DES Division 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CBI, LLC. Gulf Coast Region 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Moses Lake Container Plant 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hanover Foods, Centre Hall PA 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Operations 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pathfinder Inspections & Field Services 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.