Industry profile · NAICS 237120

Natural gas pipeline construction

Workplace injury rates across 1,128 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,128
Employers
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
6,429
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Natural gas pipeline construction average 1.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 2.8.

1.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.8
BLS national benchmark
1,128
employers reporting
6,429
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Natural gas pipeline construction Safety Data Reveals

The Natural gas pipeline construction sector (NAICS 237120) encompasses 1,128 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 6,429 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.2 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Natural gas pipeline construction that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 5 of 23
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
SES Energy Services LLC Oak Ridge, TN B 1.5
SiteWise Corporation Wheat Ridge, CO B 1.5
The Hillis Group, pLLC Easton, PA B 1.5
B. Jackson Construction & Engineering, LLC - Utah West Jordan, UT B 1.5
Oregon Office Central Point, OR B 1.5
Gray Supply Corp Randolph, NJ B 1.5
Hagerman Location Hagerman, NM B 1.5
Allegheny Contracting Ridgway, PA B 1.5
Bluestar USA Washington, PA B 1.5
Mid-America Office Topeka, KS B 1.4
Baker Consulting Mandaree, ND B 1.4
Equix Energy Services, LLC - OCALA Summerfield, FL B 1.4
Teichert Pipelines North Rocklin, CA B 1.4
Construction Division Indianapolis, IN B 1.4
Mears Installation, LLC Lenexa, KS B 1.4
Maryland Office Greater Landover, MD B 1.4
Cherokee Enterprises Inc. Medley, FL A 1.4
Mark III Plant Construction, Ltd. Sealy, TX A 1.4
Gas Field Specialist - 4 Smithton, PA A 1.4
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Firestone Polymers Sulphur, LA A 1.4
JFSNA at Sabic Burkville Burkville, AL A 1.4
USA Central Plainfield, IL A 1.4
NPL Mid-America LLC - Oklahoma Tulsa, OK A 1.4
American Piping & Boiler Co. Kapolei, HI A 1.4
AZCO INC. - Holly Frontier Cheyenne, WY A 1.4
Wenger Pipeline Construction, Inc. Dalton, OH A 1.4
Southeast Connections LLc- Greensboro, NC Greensboro, NC A 1.4
ULS Conshohocken Conshohocken, PA A 1.4
Canyon Pipeline Construction, Inc. Centerville, UT A 1.4
LMC Industrial Contractors Dansville, NY A 1.3
Seifert Welding Bay City, TX A 1.3
Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington Burlington, NJ A 1.3
Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction Dallas, TX A 1.3
JS Rae - Berkshire Charlemont, MA A 1.3
104012 - NGL-Fields Point LNG Facility Providence, RI A 1.3
InfraSource Construction, LLC Kansas City, MO A 1.3
Serimax North America, LLC Houston, TX A 1.3
Aegion Coating Services - Conroe Conroe, TX A 1.3
Gulf Synergy, LLC Houma, LA A 1.3
Worley Alaska Field Services at Hilcorp GPB O&M Projects Prudhoe Bay, AK A 1.3
Tri Span Construction LLC Louisa, KY A 1.3
807 American Petroleum Walden, NY A 1.3
Michels Pipeline- OR Redmond, OR A 1.3
JFSNA at ADM Clinton Clinton, IA A 1.3
JIS at Potash Corporation Lima Lima, OH A 1.3
Davenport Branch Davenport, IA A 1.2
Bay Ltd. @ Valero Houston Refinery Corpus Christi, TX A 1.2
Otsc Services, LLC Seminole, TX A 1.2
Bi-Con Services Derwent, OH A 1.2
Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Adairsville Adairsville, GA A 1.2
← Prev Page 5 of 23 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Natural gas pipeline construction?

This sector averages 1.2 against a BLS benchmark of 2.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.