Industry profile · NAICS 237120

Natural gas pipeline construction

Workplace injury rates across 1,128 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,128
Employers
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
6,429
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Natural gas pipeline construction average 1.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 2.8.

1.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.8
BLS national benchmark
1,128
employers reporting
6,429
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Natural gas pipeline construction Safety Data Reveals

The Natural gas pipeline construction sector (NAICS 237120) encompasses 1,128 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 6,429 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.2 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Natural gas pipeline construction that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 9 of 23
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Precision Pipeline Services Lancaster, OH A 0.7
M. O'Herron Company Pittsburgh, PA A 0.7
Worley Field Services at Sabic Burkville Burkville, AL A 0.7
Underground Construction Co Inc Benicia, CA A 0.7
Michels Pipeline - Montana Missoula, MT A 0.7
KCL Construction LLC Doyline, LA A 0.7
HMT LLC - Tulsa Tulsa, OK A 0.7
Industrial Mechanical Inc. Farmington, NM A 0.7
AZCO INC. - Pine Bend Refinery Rosemount, MN A 0.7
Underground Systems Construction, Inc. Wichita, KS A 0.7
Equix Energy Services, LLS - JACKSONVILLE Jacksonville, FL A 0.7
AGI Construction INC. Smithfield, RI A 0.7
Osha 300a Carlsbad, NM A 0.7
Wood Group USA Inc., North Dakota Service Area Williston, ND A 0.7
ASRC Energy Services Anchorage, AK A 0.7
NPL Great Lakes LLC - Special Projects Chicago, IL A 0.7
Primoris Pipeline Inc. Houston, TX A 0.7
Main Office Abbeville, LA A 0.7
CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO Longview, TX A 0.7
FHG, Inc. Mint Hill, NC A 0.7
C1622 - Lonestar Frac VI Baytown, TX A 0.7
Performance Mechanical Inc Pittsburg, CA A 0.7
Energes Services LLC Greeley, CO A 0.7
Bay Ltd @ Tesla Robstown, TX A 0.7
Worley Field Services at CITGO Lake Charles Westlake, LA A 0.7
Michels Pipeline- Elk Grove, CA Elk Grove, CA A 0.7
Wood Group USA Inc., Pipeline Services, Service Area Greeley, CO A 0.7
Marsau Enterprises, Inc Enid, OK A 0.7
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Cameron LNG-Hackberry Hackberry, LA A 0.7
Jomax Pipeline Construction Platteville, CO A 0.7
Weldtech Services, Inc. Billings, MT A 0.7
Midland, TX (Plant 6) Midland, TX A 0.7
J. Irwin Company Ltd. Bastrop, TX A 0.7
Jomax Construction Co., Inc. Great Bend, KS A 0.6
Kent_IFS Kent, WA A 0.6
Blanchette Field Services Sinton, TX A 0.6
CAM Industrial Solutions @ Sabic Burkville Burkville, AL A 0.6
Submar LLC Houma, LA A 0.6
US Pipeline Houston, TX A 0.6
Surveying And Mapping, LLC Austin, TX A 0.6
Lauren Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Abilene, TX A 0.6
WeldFit Corporation Houston, TX A 0.6
KS Energy Services (Springfield) Springfield, IL A 0.6
Jomax Construction Co., Inc. Greeley, CO A 0.6
Vaught Construction LLC Crane, MO A 0.6
CBI Services, LLC Plainfield, IL A 0.6
TSU Texas Fort Worth, TX A 0.6
Worley Modularization and Fabrication Gulf Coast Houston Pasadena, TX A 0.6
Matrix North American Construction Chicago, IL A 0.6
ATS Construction Main Corpus Christi, TX A 0.6
← Prev Page 9 of 23 Next →

Safety grades are a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA and BLS data, not an official OSHA rating. Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Related

All industries → | Rankings →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Natural gas pipeline construction?

This sector averages 1.2 against a BLS benchmark of 2.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.