Industry profile · NAICS 332911

Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 332 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

332
Employers
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
3,843
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing average 2.6 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.6
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
332
employers reporting
3,843
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing sector (NAICS 332911) encompasses 332 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 3,843 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.6 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.6 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 4 of 7
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Highland Highland Heights, OH B 2.0
Waterous Company South St Paul, Mn, MN B 2.0
Curtiss Wright Farris Engineering (10195 Brecksville) Brecksville, OH B 2.0
Control Devices Carr Lane Saint Louis, MO B 2.0
FlowSafe Orchard Park, NY B 1.9
Armstrong International - Three Rivers Division Three Rivers, MI B 1.9
McWane Plant & Industrial Exeter Exeter, CA B 1.9
Hoerbiger Corporation of America Pompano Beach, FL B 1.9
Armstrong International Three Rivers Division Three Rivers, MI B 1.9
Kimray Corporate Office Oklahoma City, OK B 1.9
Zimmermann & Jansen, Inc. Houston, TX B 1.9
Emco Wheaton Retail Corp. Wilson, NC B 1.9
Paris Industrial Services, Inc Paris, TN B 1.8
Island Lake Island Lake, IL B 1.8
Bray USA Houston Campus Houston, TX B 1.8
Metso Flow Control USA ,Inc Shrewsbury, MA B 1.8
American BOA Cumming, GA B 1.7
HOERBIGER Corporation of America, Inc. Pompano Beach, FL Pompano Beach, FL B 1.7
Elon Plant Elon, NC B 1.7
Strahman Valves, Inc. Bethlehem, PA B 1.7
Shewood Valve LLC - Valley View, OH Plant Valley View, OH B 1.7
Valmet Flow Control USA Inc NESC Lithia Springs, GA B 1.7
Pentair Valves & Controls Reno Reno, NV A 1.6
Valmet Flow Control USA Inc Shrewsbury, MA A 1.6
Emerson Pressure Management-Tulsa Tulsa, OK A 1.6
Xomox PFT Corp Cincinnati, OH A 1.6
Gasflo 19 Fairfield, NJ A 1.6
Sedco a-Prv Company Adrian, MI A 1.6
ITT Inc.- Lancaster, USA- IP Lancaster, PA A 1.6
Caldera Engineering Provo, UT A 1.5
Hunt Valve Company Salem, OH A 1.5
Regate Technology, Inc Plantersville, TX A 1.5
Mueller Water Products Decatur, IL A 1.5
Fiocchi - Little Rock Little Rock, AR A 1.5
Watts - St Pauls Saint Pauls, NC A 1.4
Morrison Bros. Co. Dubuque, IA A 1.4
ANCORP Inc Williston, FL A 1.4
Alabama Dynamics Calera, AL A 1.4
GCS Mt. Vernon Mt. Vernon, OH A 1.4
Huntersville, NC Huntersville, NC A 1.4
12970 Normandy Blvd Jacksonville, FL 32221 Orange Park, FL A 1.4
Forum Energy Technologies - Wright Rd. Stafford, TX A 1.4
Groth Corporation Stafford, TX A 1.4
GC Valves Charlotte, NC A 1.4
Continental Disc Corporation Liberty, MO A 1.4
Gemu Valves, Inc. Atlanta, GA A 1.4
Fluid Connectors : Mauston Mauston, WI A 1.3
Midland Manufacturing Skokie, IL A 1.3
Southeast Valve, Inc. Pineville, NC A 1.3
Forum Energy Technologies - Madison Madison, KS A 1.3
← Prev Page 4 of 7 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.6 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.