Industry profile · NAICS 333999

Screening and sifting machinery for general industrial use manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 268 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

268
Employers
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
3,212
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Screening and sifting machinery for general industrial use manufacturing average 3.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

3.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
268
employers reporting
3,212
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Screening and sifting machinery for general industrial use manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Screening and sifting machinery for general industrial use manufacturing sector (NAICS 333999) encompasses 268 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 3,212 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.3 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Screening and sifting machinery for general industrial use manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 6
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
PGI Mfg., LLC Peru, IL D 4.9
Omnipure Filter Company Caldwell, ID D 4.9
Great Western Manufacturing Co. Leavenworth, KS D 4.8
Hilliard Fourth Street Elmira, NY D 4.8
Adams SFC Tonawanda, NY D 4.7
Michigan Rebuild & Automation Litchfield, MI D 4.7
Marietta Plant Marietta, OK D 4.6
Hy-Pro Filtration Anderson, IN D 4.5
Seymour-Sheridan, Incorporated Monroe, CT D 4.5
GEA Mechanical Equipment US, Inc. Northvale, NJ D 4.5
IMTEC Acculine Inc Fremont, CA D 4.4
51180194--Gulfstream Service Center Savannah, GA D 4.2
International Baler Jacksonville, FL D 4.1
Gray Manufacturing Inc Saint Joseph, MO D 4.1
American Baler Company Bellevue, OH D 4.1
Pall Corporation Putnam, CT D 4.1
CI - West Union OH West Union, OH D 4.1
Oberlin Filter Company Pewaukee, WI D 4.0
Tridim Filter (Las Vegas) Las Vegas, NV D 4.0
Gachman Metals Fort Worth, TX C 3.9
Koch Separation Solutions Wilmington, MA C 3.9
The Defcon Force LLC Gallipolis, OH C 3.9
Viking Corp Hastings Hastings, MI C 3.9
FLSmidth East Coast Operation Fraziers Bottom Fraziers Bottom, WV C 3.9
Wixom Wixom, MI C 3.9
Harris Equipment Cordele Cordele, GA C 3.8
Midwestern Industries, Inc. Massillon, OH C 3.7
NFM - Mississippi Olive Branch, MS C 3.7
Ransohoff West Chester, OH C 3.6
Pall Corporation - Plant 2 Timonium, MD C 3.6
LPOA Factory & Field Grand Junction, CO C 3.5
Vektek Kansas Emporia, KS C 3.4
Komline-Barnes Rockford, IL C 3.4
Reichard Industries Columbiana, OH C 3.4
Bellowstech Florida, FL C 3.3
Donaldson Company Valencia Ca Valencia, CA C 3.2
Sparkler Filters Inc Conroe, TX C 3.2
Komline-Henry Bowling Green, OH C 3.2
Franklin Iron and Metal Corp Dayton, OH C 3.2
West Coast Winsupply Tampa, FL C 3.2
Rotex Global LLC Cincinnati, OH C 3.1
Filtra-Systems Company LLC - Columbus OH Columbus, OH C 3.1
PECOFacet - Mineral Wells Mineral Wells, TX C 3.1
Harris Equipment Baxley Baxley, GA C 3.1
City Machine & Welding Inc. Amarillo, TX C 3.0
Tisch Environmental, Inc. Cleves, OH C 2.9
Miller-Leaman HQ Daytona Beach, FL C 2.9
GENERON Houston, TX C 2.9
Setpoint LLC Ogden, UT C 2.9
Shapes Precision Manufact Palm Bay, FL C 2.9
← Prev Page 2 of 6 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Screening and sifting machinery for general industrial use manufacturing?

This sector averages 3.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.