Industry profile · NAICS 488310

Waterfront terminal operation (e.g., docks, piers, wharves)

Workplace injury rates across 94 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

94
Employers
5.2
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
1,624
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Waterfront terminal operation (e.g., docks, piers, wharves) average 5.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.1 times the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

5.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
94
employers reporting
1,624
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Waterfront terminal operation (e.g., docks, piers, wharves) Safety Data Reveals

The Waterfront terminal operation (e.g., docks, piers, wharves) sector (NAICS 488310) encompasses 94 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 1,624 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.2 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Waterfront terminal operation (e.g., docks, piers, wharves) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 2
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Port of Olympia Olympia, WA B 3.3
Kinder Morgan Portland Terminal 4 Portland, OR B 3.1
Naval Diving & Salvage Training Center (NDSTC) Panama City, FL B 3.0
Coas5t Maritime Services San Pedro, CA B 3.0
Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey Jersey City, NJ B 3.0
C-60 Berth 60 Long Beach, CA B 2.9
Pacific Container Terminal Berths 247-270 Long Beach, CA B 2.9
SCIP - Greer Terminal Greer, SC B 2.9
Wando Welch Terminal Mt. Pleasant, SC B 2.9
Dominion Terminal Associates, LLP Newport News, VA B 2.8
KCBX South Chicago, IL B 2.7
Lbct LLC Long Beach, CA B 2.7
La & Lb Long Beach, CA B 2.6
Pier A Berths 90-96 Long Beach, CA B 2.3
PENN Warehousing & Distribution, Inc. Philadelphia, PA A 2.1
Canaveral Cargo Terminal Cape Canaveral, FL A 2.1
Regional Port Operations Contract Woodbine, GA A 1.9
APM Terminals Port Elizabeth Elizabeth, NJ A 1.7
Convent Marine Terminal Convent, LA A 1.6
Pcmc - La & Lb Long Beach, CA A 1.6
SCIP - Dillon Terminal Dillon, SC A 1.4
Seaonus Stevedoring Savannah LLC Savannah, GA A 1.4
Naval Air Station Pensacola-NASP Nas Pensacola, FL A 1.3
Negociado Maritimo - Muelle 1 - 3 - 4 -6 San Juan, PR A 1.3
Negociado Maritimo - Muelle 15 y 16 San Juan, PR A 1.0
Enviva Port of Chesapeake Chesapeake, VA A 0.9
Enviva Port of Wilmington Wilmington, NC A 0.8
SCPA Headquarters Mt. Pleasant, SC A 0.6
Regional Port Operations Contract Kingsland, GA A 0.6
Negociado Maritimo - Capitania Arecibo Arecibo, PR A 0.3
Moran New York & New Jersey Staten Island, NY A 0.3
Negociado Maritimo - Puertos y Conservacion San Juan, PR C 0.0
Negociado Maritimo - Capitania Mayaguez Mayaguez, PR C 0.0
Negociado Maritimo - Capitania Ponce Ponce, PR C 0.0
Whittier Terminal Whittier, AK C 0.0
Enviva Port of Pascagoula Pascagoula, MS C 0.0
105588 - BAEJSR Shiplift Drydock Jacksonville, FL C 0.0
Port of Vancouver USA Vancouver, WA C 0.0
Negociado Maritimo - Capitania Guayanilla Guayanilla, PR C 0.0
Negociado Maritimo - Capitania Guayama Guayama, PR C 0.0
Negociado Maritimo - Capitania Guanica Guanica, PR C 0.0
Administrative Building Bellingham, WA C 0.0
Savage Services - Carolina Marine Terminal Wilmington, NC C 0.0
Kinder Morgan Vancouver Bulk Terminal Vancouver, WA C 0.0
← Prev Page 2 of 2
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Waterfront terminal operation (e.g., docks, piers, wharves)?

This sector averages 5.2 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.