Industry profile · NAICS 562910

Environmental remediation services

Workplace injury rates across 829 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

829
Employers
3.0
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
3,921
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Environmental remediation services average 3.0 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.2 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

3.0
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
829
employers reporting
3,921
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Environmental remediation services Safety Data Reveals

The Environmental remediation services sector (NAICS 562910) encompasses 829 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 3,921 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.0 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.0 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Environmental remediation services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 4 of 20
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Cross Environmental Services, Inc Zephyrhills, FL D 4.0
MEC, Inc. dba MEC Environmental, Inc. Edwards Afb, CA D 3.9
Progress Environmental, LLC Capitol Heights, MD D 3.9
Headquarters Waukesha, WI D 3.9
Blue Flame Crew, LLC Naperville, IL D 3.9
NRC Gulf Environmental Services, Inc. - San Antonio Cibolo, TX D 3.9
Soil and Land Services Remediation Leadwood, MO D 3.8
TankTek, inc. DBA EnviroTek DBA Action Environmental, LLC Tampa, FL D 3.8
Atlanta Morrow, GA D 3.8
HPC Industrial Services LLC H22 Youngstown, OH D 3.8
Colorado Hazard Control North Office Denver, CO D 3.8
Hydrometrics, Inc. Helena, MT D 3.8
Essex VT Essex Junction, VT D 3.8
Environmental Projects, Inc. Auburn, ME D 3.7
Coldfoot Environmental Services, Inc. Anchorage, AK D 3.7
GAMA Contracting Services, Inc. South El Monte, CA D 3.7
New Hope New Hope, MN D 3.7
United Metals Recycling - Boise Boise, ID D 3.7
Coleman Upper Lake Upper Lake, CA D 3.7
NRC Corporation: Massena Massena, NY D 3.6
Tidewater Powell, Ohio Powell, OH D 3.6
Damage Control Oviedo, FL D 3.6
Path Light Consulting, LLC. Winter Springs, FL D 3.6
NRC Corporation: Syracuse-Branch Syracuse, NY D 3.6
Arrow Services Houston, TX D 3.5
Enkay Engineering & Equipment Co Inc Fountain Valley, CA D 3.5
Huntington Ingalls Newport News Shipbuilding Newport News, VA D 3.5
Environmental Plant Services, Inc. Saint Paul, MN D 3.5
Clean Harbors Industrial Services Inc 84YPV Port Arthur, TX D 3.5
FECC Orlando Orlando, FL D 3.4
Luse Environmental Services Aurora, IL D 3.4
Environmental Services, Inc South Windsor, CT D 3.4
Field and Technical Services Carnegie, PA D 3.4
ERS Corp Jacksonville, FL D 3.4
Corporate Division Tucson, AZ D 3.4
MGM Contracting Inc. San Diego, CA D 3.4
AAC Contracting, LLC Rochester, NY D 3.3
Dec-Tam Corporation North Reading, MA D 3.3
JKS Industries, LLC Lakewood, CO D 3.3
Specialized Response Solutions, L.P. Fort Worth, TX D 3.3
Colfax Corporation Chicago, IL D 3.3
Bu# 109 West Sacramento, CA D 3.3
Dickson Company Tacoma, WA D 3.3
Abatement and Mitigation Services Columbus, OH D 3.3
A&D Environmental Services (SC), LLC. Lexington, SC D 3.3
Environmental Demolition Insight Inc. Denver, CO D 3.2
CVE NB Contracting Group Inc dba Central Valley Environmental Rohnert Park, CA D 3.2
Sasser restoration LLC Whitsett, NC D 3.2
1397_17153 Tampa, FL D 3.2
Power Component Systems, Inc. - Pennsylvania Camp Hill, PA D 3.2
← Prev Page 4 of 20 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Environmental remediation services?

This sector averages 3.0 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.